Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />Further discussion took place between councilmen and Mr. Shelby with regard to fares <br />terminating at Portland and conceivability of mass transit at some future time cutting down <br />on air fares between Eugene and Portland, ratio between general air traffic and carriers, <br />maintenance of runways and construction to accommodate larger aircraft, possibility of <br />this airport's becoming a regional air center with discontinuance of air service to other <br />communities in this area. Mr. Shelby said the Airport Commission has a task force at work <br />on ways and means of a regional air center and will be bringing a recommendation to the <br />Council in that regard. With regard to vertical takeoff aircraft, he said it would not <br />seem likely provision of that type aircraft for transportation of passengers could be <br />accomplished by 1975. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal wondered whether the City should embark upon a program requlrlng the finances set <br />forth in this Plan. Mayor Anderson called attention to the proposed ordinance which would <br />charge an enplaning fee and said that would partially take care of financial considerations. <br />Mr. Shelby commented on the importance of beginning planning and engineering of runway <br />strengthening because of the considerable lead time necessary for such a project. Manager <br />said adoption of this Master Plan does not commit the City to expenditure of money nor <br />would it prohibit attempt to get someone else to share the burden. <br /> <br />Mr. Shelby in answer to Mrs. Campbell said there are only about 70 of some 530 airports <br />in the United States which are not receiving subsidies from general tax base funds. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />John Alltucker, member of the Airport Commission, commented on the Master Plan in general. <br />He said each of the objections raised had been discussed by the Airport Commission in its <br />deliberations and projections used in the Master Plan are those believed to be necessary. <br />He said air travel is being used increasingly by an increasing percentage of people and can <br />be considered one form of mass transportation. With regard to statement about use of tax <br />monies for parKing facilities, Mr. Alltucker said there were no tax monies used for that <br />purpose, the people operating the lot paid for its construction. At the time it was built <br />consideration was given to the City's paying for it to provide free parking, but it was <br />decided the facilities should be paid for by those who use them. <br /> <br />Manager called attention to letter from Mr. Alltucker, copies of which were previously dis- <br />tributed to Council, in which he expressed concern about construction on private properties <br />in the vicinity of the Airpo~t~and tne need for equitable solution to the zoning process <br />in order to protect those lands from development or encroachment upon airport uses. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson expressed his confidence in the Commission's being aware of environmental <br />problems faced. He feels the Master Plan submitted is satisfactory to keep abreast of air <br />transportation needs in this area and that there will be opportunity to discuss individual <br />recommendations before they are implemented. He feels it important at this time to adopt <br />the Plan as a blueprint for air transportation facilities in this area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell asked if problems are anticipated in redesignation of the industrial property <br />to agricultural, whether homes will be allowed in that .area and the residents then disturbed <br />by planes. Manager replied that the'property in question is owned by the City and will be <br />used as airport property. <br /> <br />Mrs. -Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to adopt the Airport Master Plan <br />and Airport Layout Plan with changes recommended by the Airport Commission. <br />Motion carried unanimOUSly. <br /> <br />2. 'Ordinance, Airport Boarding Fee - Copies of proposed ordinance which provides <br />'for $2.00 enplaning fee at Mahlon Sweet Field commencing February 15, 1973 <br />were previously distributed to Council members. The Airport Commission. recarn- <br />,mended its adoption. Manager explained that imposition of the fee was dis- <br />: cussed prior to this time but Congress enacted legislation making it illegal. <br />: The President subsequently vetoed the bill. Security at the Airport lis are'" <br />: suI t of Federal action wi th no provision xor financing required a source of <br />,l'funds, and it is felt the boarding fee wiJl meet that need as well as provide <br />: money for other needs at the Airport. <br />I <br />I In answer to Councilman Williams, Airport Manager Shelby said collection of <br />, the fee would be made at the terminal building, wi th some type of boarding pass <br />issued which cannot be reused. It is planned to make the process reasonably <br />simple in order not to delay passengers. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />; Councilman Keller asked about allocation of funds. by the Budget Committee to <br />: provide protection at the Airport. Manage,r explained that the recommendation <br />: was to use Federal revenue sharing funds for security at the Airport w.i.th the <br />, conal tion made verbally at the Budget CoJll.lll:i ttee meeting that if th. b(Jardi~g <br />fee were e,stablished the allocation Wbuld be deleted from revenue sharing funds. I <br />Administratively, he said, it is pt'eferable to use th.e boarding fee as a sou.t'ce ; <br />of funds as it reflects directly on the utler rather than taking from revenues j <br />of the entire City. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />1/22/73 - 5 <br />