02/26/1973 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

7. C.B.IS4 - Levying assessments from Gilham Road to No written protests on file. for paving, sanitary and storm sewers on Brewer Avenue Norkenzie Road (72-7 and 72-S) No objections presented at hearing. Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. Approve . I I ;S. i C.B.1S5 - Levying assessments for paving and storm sewer on lSth Avenue from Bailey Hill ! Road to 1050 feet west (72-4S) No written protests on file. No objections presented at hearing. I Mr. Teitzel said that the ~9 special sewer assessment was in error and that cdrrectl~ had bee~made. Mrs. Burgoyne was given a corrected copy of the statement which also reflected a change in the ownership listing to her name only. With regard to the property description, Mr. Teitzel said that would be checKed-out ,--but-regardless of' the manner in which the description was written the square footage assesse~ would not be altered. The area involved is based on q depth of 147~ feet. It Considerable discussion followed between Mrs. Burgoyne, Panel members, and staff re- viewing essentially the same arguments raised at the public hearing on award of bid in September. Mr. Hershner remarked that the Council had viewed the property and was familiar with the terrain involved in this project. Appr~ve Recommendation: Levy assessments as proposed. Manager called attention to the Panel's recommendation that C.B.1SO levying assessment for the Coburg Road sidewalk be held until opinion received from City Attorney with regard to property owner's failure to receive proper notice. For that reason it is not proposed to proceed with passage of'that council bill at this time. ,S. :, Non'-discrimi]{ation iffidavi.t, Liquor- Licenses - Mrs. Beal ~sked at the request of the Human Rights COmnUssion that discussion be scheduled with regard to requiring a non-discrimination affidavit from applicants for renewal of liquor licenses prior to Counci 1 approval. .; ',,=,~';" Mr. Williams suggested that prior to discussion the Human Rights Commission be asked to present its reasons for not including in the request the subject of discrimina- , tion against women and religious groups since the Council acted to include those two in the ordinance. He also suggested that the COmnUssion be asked to present a clear ; statement why they feel this recommendation is not an infringement upon First Amend- ment guaranteed rights. In making the suggestions Mr. Williams said both questions were raised at the time previous consideration was given the request for affidavit. M~S. Beal said another consideration might be pending legislation in view of possible extensive reworking of the OLCC rules and regulations. Comm 2/14/73 Affirm It. was understood the item would be scheduled for future discussion. T. -Segregation of Assessment Procedure - Councilman McDonald asked if there could be 'some explanation of the manner and reason for segregation of assessments. He .noted that people attending Council meetings do not understand these items when they appear on the agenda. Comm 2/14/73 File u. .policy, Council Motions - Councilwoman Campbell asked for clarification of the I minutes wi th regard to recording of votes of the Council on motions, sometimes showing how members voted, sometimes showing only that the motion carried. She ; referred specifically to the vote on S.B.100 at the February 7 cOmrrUttee meeting. 'She suggested that the committee meeting could be considered a work session with la consensus recorded rather than motions being acted upon. .d e It was generally agreed that continuing the system of acting upon motions at the committee meeting would be desirable and it was decided the subject would be dis- cussed and worked out in a meeting of the Council on :j. ts procedures. Comm 2/14/73 Affirm ,tlL. 2/26/73 - 16 / 'I'