Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IIn answer to Councilman w~ lliams, Manager said the alleys in the block now <br />occupied by Twin Oaks are not involved. <br /> <br />Assistant Manager said that staff has est~mated the value of the City's interest <br />at $64,000 - land value plus improvements, plus a major change in storm drainage <br />or curb grade. Staff feels the $1.00 proffered is not acceptable. Manager cau- <br />tioned about creating a public appearance of resisting the Federal project because <br />of t;he number of years spent encouraging construction at that location. However, <br />there is the obligation to see that the City is treated fairly. <br /> <br />In answer to Councilman Williams, Assistant Manager said that franchise agreements <br />are being reviewed with regard to any obligation of the City to remove privately- <br />owned publi c utili ties from the alleys. He said so far nothing has been found, <br />but that it would be a matter for the City Attorney to resolve. Franchise agree- <br />ments generally provide that where the public interest is to be served, the public <br />is not obligated to pay for removal of private facilities. <br /> <br />Comm <br />5/2/73 <br />Approve <br /> <br />... i <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded ]:Jy Mr. Williams to authorize negotiation, of a. fair price <br />for vacation of the alley~.. .Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />J.Improvement Petitions <br />1. Paving Jacobs Street from Concord to Fairfield - petitioned by owners of 100% of <br />p'roperty to be assessed for the project to serve a development approved by the <br />Planning Commission on property owned by Hansen Bros. <br /> <br />2~ Construction of sanitary sewer in area between 1500 feet north and 1300 feet <br />south of 25th Avenue from 500 feet east of Brittany to 160 feet east of Hawkins <br />Lane - fetitioned by owners of 23% of total square footage to be assessed. <br />Manager explained that the sewer will be extended,-ap!,oss a large undeveloped area <br />to service the area petitioned, Ees-Elting_in deferral ~liection of assessment <br />against the vacant property. On questioning from Council members, Public Works <br />Director said the facility is one of two systems which will serve the entire area. <br />An agreement has been reached on deferring collection of assessment against the <br />undeveloped property in return for easement. Properties in the ownership of <br />those signing the petition plus the undeveloped area represent about 70% of <br />the total square footage to be assessed. The lOCation of the sewer line is the <br />only practical way to reach the properties to be served. Payment of the de- <br />ferredassessment will come from sewer utility funds, monies collected from <br />water user charges. Those people not signing the petition will be notified of <br />public hearing at time of bid award. <br /> <br />"- <br /> <br />3. Paving Meadow Lane from Maple Street to Vista Street - petitioned by owners 'of <br />58% of the properties to be assessed, to serve an industrial area south of <br />Elmira Road. <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to accept the three peti tions. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />CO!lll1l <br />5/2/73 <br />Approve <br /> <br />K. permi ts, Mobile Homes for Watchmen in Industrial, Zones <br />1'.' Bruce Werth Trucking co., 71 North Danebo <br />2: Loggers Equipment Exchange, 3709 West 11th Avenue <br />Staff recommends approval of both permits. <br /> <br />Comm <br />5/2/73 <br />Approve <br /> <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to approve the requests" Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />L.Annexation, Bonnie View Lane and Sarah Lane (Marvin and Leslie Allender) - Peti- <br />tioned by owners of 100% of property involved (Tax Lots 200-300-400-500), creating <br />an island of an area outside the City previously annexed by the Boundary Commission, <br />the legality of which was challenged in court. Planning Commission on May 1, 1973 <br />recommended that the Allender property be annexed and asked that the Council trans- <br />mit that recommendation to the Boundary Commission for its May 3 hearing of the <br />petition. The petition was initially filed with the Boundary Commission, so <br />statutory time. limitations require action by.that body. If the Boundary Commission <br />. approves the annexation;' it would appear the law suit is moot with regard to whe- <br />ther the previous island annexation waslerJall!l..constituted. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray a$ked i..'" there were ang p~ojections in the 1990 Plan about growth <br />in that area. Manager an,;wered that all of the area to the McKenzie River is in- <br />cluded in the urban 'servi ,::e boundary. <br /> <br />Comm <br />Mr. williams moved seconced 1,JY Mr. Mu'rrag ~o transmit to the Boundary Commission 5/2/73 <br />the reoo'!'IRendation to annex the Allender pro.pertg. Motion carried unanimo.uslll..~ Approve <br /> <br />M. 's .B. 73 - State Building Code. Subcommittee supported Superintendent of Build- <br />ing Inspection Mortier's position that if a State Building Code is adopted, <br />'uniform national model codes should be used. Mr. Mortier was authorized to <br />present testimony in the way he presented it to the subcommittee, opposing <br />the bill in its pre~~nt form. <br /> <br />Comm <br />5/2/73 <br />, l:lpprove <br /> <br />141 <br /> <br />5/14/73 - 7 <br />