|
<br />,
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Nelson Page, 1815 NopkenzieRoad, .askedrejection.of,the poll indicating preference for
<br />center turn lane. ~e said the only major interseqting arterial requiring a. turn lane was
<br />Goodpasture Island Road. . He recommended constructiono6f sidewalk adjacent to the curb
<br />. thereby eliminating two-foot grass strip.
<br />
<br />/, Al Cassidy, owner of propert ies on Linnea, asked whether sewer costs .woul,d be assessed to
<br />those properties if the sewer is connected to Linnea. He said aslon~ as. Norke.:rzie and
<br />Oakway are considered arterials the curb and gutter costs should not be; asses;o;e.d to abut-
<br />ting properties, especially in R-l zones. He felt the City should assume those costs.
<br />Public Works Directo~ answered that sanitary sewer connections to thre~ vacant properties
<br />on Linnea will be assessed; storm sewer cost will be paid by the City.' He explained that
<br />the cost for paving in excess of the 36-foot width and for the bike lanes would be paid by
<br />the City.
<br />
<br />Public hearing was closed.
<br />
<br />,. \ --', . ~. It. I . . (' " ~: ..: ,.l~'~ . '.
<br />~ublic Works Director said the plan originally pro~ided.fo~ .parking on each siqe of the
<br />street except at, the .intersection of Goodpasture Island Road, where a .turn lane would be
<br />installed. He did not know the validity of the poll indicating preference for:center turn
<br />lane, so suggested approval of the 44-foot paving with authorizatlon~.for staff to work with
<br />owners of abutting properties to determine where parking or turn lanes would be provided.
<br />Councilmen Williams and Murray favored proceedipg with the 44-foot paving which would allow
<br />room for the bike lanes and parking with restrictions at major intersections. This would
<br />ailow'width for. center turn lane in the future should it become necessary.
<br />
<br />.' . Mrs. Beal moved. seconded. by Mr. .Willi~~s to award contract for 44-foot paving
<br />on the low alternate bid price with staff to hav:e authorization to work out
<br />variation's fo'r center turn land and/or biJ<e path.. . __. . . . .. '"
<br />
<br />Councilman Hershner wondered whether xhe 42~foot. paving could be used if it..is decided to ,9
<br />install the turn lane for the entire length of the project. He asked how property owners
<br />would be contact!=d to determine the design wanted. Public Works Director answered that
<br />since' the bids were.called.on both 40-. and 4.4-foot paving, unit bid.pric.es.,\iould.be.such.
<br />that' the contract cofrld be reduced to. 42-foot width.. He said .each proper.tyowner would
<br />be contacted to determine choice between parking and turn lane ,with a deadline. for r.eturn
<br />of that information, then staff would assume. they have the option .of bringing to .Council for
<br />a decision unless ther:'e.. is a great maj.orityin favor .of either .one or the o:ther. ".
<br />
<br />~, .. . .. .
<br />
<br />Manager noted Mr. Page's request for elimination of the grass pa~king strip and said curb
<br />
<br />sidewalk is planned.
<br />
<br />
<br />Rollcall.vote was taken on the motion as stated. M.otion carried, all councilmen
<br />
<br />present v.oting. aye. " . . .
<br />
<br />
<br />"^; i ~;c: ^~O 5TO!UI 5r.I.'V,R I I
<br />:iJ:-i):;-kway RO:1-.:1iro;;;oa!tmont WilY to Cnl Youns . . ...::i ' ". .
<br />. i,,,oJ (170). , ..
<br />" t.2' IlASIC 40' AT.TEn/lATe STOrof Sr.WER 'SANl'l'AnY SJ:l/F.~
<br />
<br />. j. 1. 1/1 1diah COM truction C"/lIpnny.... ..$119,326.7:I".! .;.. :.$113,541. 63................. j.. ~$91, 719 .80... .;.. ~ ..$2,657'.00 :
<br />2. EU3cna Sand & CravQl.C(JmpanY......$121.B22.60....~.$122.425.35 .' . $89.460.80 $2,615.00 " I
<br />), Davcrcau~ & Pratt..............._.$129,52J.96......$126,574.l3 $95,050,14 $2,799.50 .
<br />I
<br />Coot to. COBt t.J City .. /lm<'lunt 1I11"ltf!t.,..!
<br />~~!..~.~~.
<br />ltculd~ntlo1..................$ 15.40 h/It Pnvlng...(40') $ 9.4/.7.00....(42') $ 6,106.00, $10.407.00
<br />Uduw"y ^rr""0 " Dike 1.an"0.....$10.712.00..........$21.960.00 $12.180.00
<br />5" t:onc..................$ O.OJ oq. Ct. Storm Scwcr....$Ol,070.00..........$1I1,070.00 $7It,000.00
<br />1't CO"c..................$ 1.,10 Dq. ft.
<br />I OO"W.1Y ruo
<br />S' Cone. Stdcwn1k........$ J.65 It/It . i
<br />San. Sevcr.............. .$1,469.00 1
<br />,olli tary Sew,,,r 0 tree~. .. .. .. ~1, 303. CO. I COHl'LtTIOl1 OATlll October,l, 1973
<br />. . ....,- . - .- .~~'_.-." . '
<br />'.' ..'-.---. l'::/-'I::;;.' '. (I . -. 'i~": ':'1'd3:1;i."'7:t- . .:._.~-~ .' . <+'.-'. ---'..,--, __~F--.---.~
<br />Public Works. Direct.o:rl r~vieV:led.,bids on 42-f00t (basie),r.af!.d<!+{).,;.,f00t (alternate) paving..
<br />Designs were previ.ously. presented.,t.o pr0perty 0wners iflc-techr-lical hearing.. Staff and Bi-
<br />cycle C.ommittee .recommend inc;lifs~on of bike.lane.withih..the~ci1rb section.; , Alternate
<br />49-foot paving was discussed,~, n.oting - that, that. width -W0Ul.<i:'a,dq.;about $18,000 :.tq. the bid
<br />price. Council agreed bike .lanes sh0uld be included wi:th~n.the-curb section..
<br />
<br />,-.;,..
<br />
<br />Publicihearing was opened.
<br />
<br />'.~ Harr~ Wright, .~190 Law.Lane, expresse~ c.oncern over. inadequacy of 10-foot turn lane prov. ided
<br />. for ln the varlOUS deslgns. He felt lt w.ould. be better to'removetrees along the street to
<br />provide more~width for the center' lane. He also wanted. the bike lanes installed'behind the
<br />curb. He felt 9pinions of. property owners with pegard to bike~ lanes behind th~'curb were
<br />~ not. considered, and wondered in vi~w of..the poll taken why the design 'presented provided
<br />only a 10-f.oot turning lane and bike lanes in the'street.- Mr. Wright also expressed the
<br />.opini.on that the City should pay more .of. the cost for improvement of arterial type streets.
<br />
<br />Jim Rodman, 2190 Oakmont Way, thought cost of the improvement ~ould place a burden upon s.ome
<br />of the elderly owners of abutting properties which would be assessed. He felt the project
<br />
<br />.i"
<br />
<br />2.0 S 6/25/73 - 5
<br />
|