Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br /> Council Bill No. 344 - Zoning RA area east of Chuckanut Street between Wingate and <br /> Crescent Avenue was submitted and cread the first time by council bill number and title <br />- only, there beiDg no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. <br />\, <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be read the second time by council <br /> bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered <br /> at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was, read the second time by council <br /> bill number only. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final <br /> passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen,present votinga~e, the bill was declared <br /> passed and'numbered 16879. <br /> Council Bill No. 345 - Zoning RA area west of Four Oaks Road south of 18th Avenue <br /> was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being <br /> I no councilman, present requesting that it be read in- full. <br /> Mr. Williams moved s~conded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be read the second time by council <br /> bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered <br /> at this time.' Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council <br /> bill number only. ,,' <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final <br />. passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed <br /> and numbered 16880. <br /> Council Bill No. 346 - Zoning RA area east of Calvin Street north of Western Drive <br /> extended was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, <br /> there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> I <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be read the second time by council <br /> bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered <br /> at this time. Motion carried unanimously. and the bill was read the second time by council <br /> bill number only. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final passage. <br /> Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered <br /> 16881. <br /> ~ --:- . ~ <br /> C~unSil-Bill No. 347 - Zoning RA area on both sides of Sarah Lane north of Bonnie View <br /> Drive was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there <br /> being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that. the bill be read the second time by council <br />- bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered <br /> at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council <br /> bill number only. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final <br /> passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed <br /> and numbered 16882. <br /> F. Code Amendment, Sections 9.676-9.682 re: Procedure and Bases for Zone Changes <br /> ~'o': See 7/3/73 committee discussion pa~e 13 these minutes. <br /> Planning Commission recommended adoptlon on June 5, 1973. <br /> The proposed amendment provides that the Council makes certain findings prior to <br /> action on zone changes. A change of zone should be consistent with and promote <br /> ~ ~ . . the objectives of the General Plan and zoning ordinance, and should meet a public <br /> need wh~eh would be best served by changing classification of a property in question <br /> as compared with other available property. The amendment also provides that Planning <br /> Commission decision on rezoning is final unless appealed to the Council within a ten- <br /> day period of that decision. <br /> Public hearing was held with no ~estimony presented. <br />-. Councilman Williams asked whether the amendment was prompted by the Fasano decision <br /> with regard to zoning decisions and whether findings of the Commission would be <br />- presented in written form. He sugge~ted chang~ng the woroing with respect to an <br /> appeal-to tl1e Cqupcil which states!\":.,,~::;wh:i,chsta<te -wgerein it, is, granted th1=re was <br /> error.' by the Planning Commission.,. '.,1' Manager ~aid the amendment was started before <br /> the Fasano decision, and there may be further changes pending legal analysis of that <br /> . . . ..' .. ~ <br /> decision. This proposed amendment brings requirements closer to those of the Supreme <br /> Court as set out in the Fasano decision. ~e said the City Attorney has asked for <br /> '2.2..1 7/9/73 - 5 <br /> I <br />