Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> regarding contr~~ts, -hiring, etc. It was felt the-joliiF Housing' Commi ttee would <br /> certainly look at all legal aspects. Councilman Murray mentioned the concern <br /> that analysis should go into the division of the $150,000 as it is a small <br /> amount. Mrs. Campbell hoped that the housing committee would also explore using Comm ." <br /> a portion of the monies for subsidizing rent for the aging. I <br /> '7/11/73 <br /> Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. Approve <br />In answer~o Co~ncilman McDonald, Manager confirmed the understanding that the proposal <br />would be inthe'riature of inquiry at this time rather than a firm contract because of <br />the legalities which would be involyed <br />B. Co~til1Ua-tiori-of-D1.scussl~n're: ' , Code'Restrictlon Prohlbltlng'Persons under 'Age of <br /> 21 to Sell Merchandise to Dealers in Used Merchandise- City Attorney opinion had <br /> ,been distributed to counci-T' explaining that legailrj an amendment would be acceptable <br /> 'that would lower the age to 18. City Manager indicated that the Police Department <br /> does not resist that change. <br /> John Rutledge of the Police Department explained that, if the provision calling <br /> 'for a second-hand store, to hold goods for 7 days were to be deleted or reduced <br /> as to time span, the Police Department could not operate with that provision. There <br /> would be no objection to reducing the age limit, however. <br />. Councilman Wood wondered whether it is appropriate for the Council to restrict a .' <br /> person's legal rights. Art Johnson of the City Attorney's office said that is <br /> 'not uncommon; for instance, public policy determines the age for driving. The <br /> Council of course could determine that there are valid considerations for not <br /> allowing minors to deal in used merchandise. Such a restriction would then be <br /> constitutionally valid. <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the Council request the City Attorney <br /> to draw up an ordinance change lowering the 21-year limit for buying and selling Comm <br /> merchandise to 18. 7/11/73 <br /> Ap;prove <br /> Ed Kenyon of the Register-Guard wondered whether the 7-day restriction would ~.. i - ~ , <br /> apply to swaps. City Attorney advised he did not think it would apply to swap ,---- <br /> si tua tions . The original ordinance was concerned with a person under 21 not being' <br /> able to give good title. <br /> Vote was taken on the motion, which carried unanimously. <br />Councilman McDonald inquired about transfer of title to merchandise in swaps which might <br />be made by ,someone ,under 21. ,He felt ,this ,situation would open the dOQr for trading of <br />any type merchandise. Manager answered that merchandise owned by an 18-year-old and <br />swapped would presumably constitute a firm contract. It would 'apply: to used merchandise -' <br />only. ,- -" ... <br />C. Deferred- income -piar;'loT-ci't:.':i._~ul?erviso'ijj__EmplolJ~es -';'-'Manager explained' tbe" new <br /> deferred income plan for supervisory employees. He stated that it is necessary <br /> for the City Council to adopt a resolution authorizing the City to implement the <br /> program. Comm <br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to adopt such a resolution at the next 7/11/73 <br /> Iregularly scheduled meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br />D. Planning Commission Recommendations (June 18,and 25, ,J,,9,?,~) <br /> l. Vacate utility easement north of Larch, east of Larkwood - Call hearing Approve <br /> 2. " " " west of Conger, north of West 10th- Call hearing Approve <br />E. Liquor Licenses <br /> l. Change of Ownership, New Frontier Market, 1101 West 8th (PB) Approve <br /> 2. New Outlet, Chef Francisco, 1400 Cross Street (Industrial Alcohol) Approve <br />Manager pointed out addition of hearings to be called on Planning Commission recommenda- <br />tions and liquor license applications as listed, both received since July 11 committee. <br />F. 'Parade' Route -problems'- Cou'ncilman Murray ~~ivfsed th~t 'h~ hils 'recelved'compla'ints .' . <br /> 'involving parades, particularly the Rodeo parade held last Saturday. The <br /> complaints fall into two categories: Before and after the parade, horses are <br /> ,wa~~ed to and from their destinations on residents' sidewalks, leaving piles of/ <br /> ev~i!!f!nce. He feels that any law on the subject should be enforced; and, if no " <br /> law exists, one should be considered; the other problem has to do with the ' Comm <br /> parking of cars on parade routes, blocking the view of those sitting on curbs.': 7/11~73 <br /> A parking prohibition should be considered. ' Aff~rm <br /> 2.37 7/23/73 - 6 <br />