My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/24/1973 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1973
>
09/24/1973 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 11:31:59 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:13:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/24/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> ~ <br /> petit~on recommended (August 7, 1973) annexation of a larger area bounded on the <br /> north and, east by the existing City limits, on the west by easterly right-of-way <br /> of Delta Highway, and on the south by the southernmost properties that can be served -~ <br /> by extension of the present sewer system. Planning Director added that the Country <br /> Club area was not recommended for annexation at this time since fhe,slopeof the <br /> iliand ,inthat.area-:is such that it cannot be served by the existing system. <br /> Slides of the area originally petitioned and of the larger area were shown and a <br /> general description of the property given. It comprises about 331 acres, approxi- <br /> mately 325 homes with a population of a little more than 1000, and an assessed valua- <br /> tion of about $12 million. <br /> Roy Burns of Lane County Building and Sanitation Department told of a 1968-69 study <br /> made by that Department of the same general area recommended by the Planning Commis- <br /> sion for annexation. He cited statistics resulting from that sutdy on the number <br /> of failing septic tanks, and said that experience from studies in other areas has <br /> shown that re-evaluation of an area after a four-year time lag results in~a 13% in- <br /> crease in failures in that length of time. He felt those conditions would apply to <br /> the Willagillespie area were it to be re-evaluated at this time. He displayed slides <br /> showing soild capabilities for dwelling units and surface drainage patterns - all <br /> indicating a need for sewers. He added that servicing the area originally petitioned <br /> for annexation would only partially solve the problem because of septic tank failures <br /> located in the southern portion. <br /> Planning Director pointed out on slides locations of failing septic. tanks at the time '. <br /> of the 1968-69 study. He described roads in the area as substandard and said a <br /> land use survey indicated general single-family use, although there is some manufactur- <br /> ing, several schools, and commercial development. He further explained that the <br /> Planning Commission initially received staff recommendation to annex a small area near <br /> and north of Cal Young Road, but then asked staff to look at a smaller area. After <br /> reviewing both the smaller area and the entire area which could be annexed, staff made <br /> the pre'sent recommendation because the properties could be served by existing sewers <br /> and because of information received from the County Health Department. <br /> Councilman McDonald asked whether in comparing this area to the Crest Drive and Danebo <br /> areas age of housing and s~~tic tanks were taken into consideration. Mr. Burns <br /> answered that there was no statistical comparison on age of housing or state of re- <br /> pair, although there would be some newer housing in the Willagillespie area. <br /> Councilwoman Beal asked whether density of housing is more important tqan type of <br /> soil and age of housing in considering whether an area is suitable for sep~ictanks. <br /> Mr. Burns answered that State Board of Health regulations governing installation of I <br /> sewage disposal systems do not relate to density. The regulations apply strictly to <br /> physical evaluation of specific areas. <br /> Councilman Williams asked the difference between the annexation of the Crest Heights '. <br /> area wherein the State Board of Health ordered annexation and this instance wherein <br /> the County is saying there is a health hazard. Mr. Burns explained that under the <br /> "health hazard" law either the Councilor a citizen of an area can initiate annexa- <br /> tion proceedings. Recent legislation has extended that option to local health de- <br /> partment s . After the initial step, annexation proceedings then are pretty much a <br /> mechanical process. With regard to the Willagillespie area, he said, it is encircled <br /> by the City and the City can annex whenever sewers can be extended to it. Since there <br /> is already one action pending before the State Health Division (Skyline Loop annexa- <br /> tion) under the health hazard law, it was felt a request for the City to take action <br /> would be speedier. I <br /> Councilman Murray asked then if the health hazard was any less severe in view of <br /> different process being followed to gain annexation and sewers. Mr. Burns said it <br /> wasn't. He added that the Willagillespie area was rated among the top five most <br /> hazardous health areas in Lane County in the last three to five years, in answer to <br /> Mrs. Beal's question regarding severity of the problem. <br /> Councilman Hershner asked then if favorable action is not taken to annex whether the <br /> County would recommend proceeding with "health hazard" annexation, it being more or <br /> less a procedural matter. Mr. Burns said the Counth Health Department does consider . <br /> this a health hazard area but they feel the problem can be solved more quickly by the <br /> City's taking action itself rather than initiating health hazard annexation procedure. <br /> Planning Director added that only recently have sewers been available to the Willa- <br /> gillespie area so that action with regard to any health hazard probably could not have <br /> been undertaken much sooner. The area is regarded as a logical part of the City and <br /> should be included from the standpoint of planning for the central part of the metro- <br /> politan region. <br /> 2:90 9/24/73 - 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.