My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/23/1973 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1973
>
10/23/1973 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 10:48:46 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:13:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/23/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />f1.nanc]"iiIly--on a broader base. They also recommended -that the -c1. ty contract for a-n <br />economic feasibility study by the consulting firm which prepared the Airport Master <br />Plan in order to get a financial projection of the airport's ability to sustain it- <br />self as well as suggest how to enhance its earning, capability, thereby making its e - <br />ownership less burdensome to the County if it is willing to accept the facility. ' <br /> <br />Norva1 Ritchey, member of the Airport Commission, told the Council that the-Commis- <br />sion had given unanimous approval to the Task Force recommendations. <br /> <br />Councilman McDonald thouqht it more appropriate that the County be asked to "approve <br />the concept of County ownership" than to "accept ownership." <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell asked if there had been any indication of how the County would <br />finance the airport. She wondered what would happen if a financing proposal were <br />rejected again by voters. Manager answered that there was no specific proposal. <br />The recommended economic study would indicate the most appropriate method. Bob Shelby, <br />~airport manager, re~~that there- was some thinking in the County that financing <br />- measures should be ironed out at staff 1 eve1f irst. TlieCofll17ii ssloners do not at <br />this time have any particular plan for airport operation. Mr. Ritchey added that <br />the economic feasibility study was included as a part of the total plan for transfer. <br />The Commission was thinking of the possibility of the airport's being a profit- <br />making venture in the next five to ten years. <br /> <br />Councilman Wood expressed support for the recommended approach to provide a larger <br />tax base for airport operation, and said the economic study seemed a logical first ~ <br />!step in that direction. ' <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to endorse by resolution the concept Comm <br />of County ownership and operation of Mahlon Sweet Field. 10/10/73 <br />Approve <br />In answer to Councilman Keller, Manager said City capital investment at the airport <br />would be transferred to the County. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />D.'Economic Feasibility Study, Mah10n Sweet Field - Recommendation was to engage Arnold <br />Thompson Associates at an estimated cost of $8,000 to prepare an economic feasibility <br />study on Mah10n Sweet Field. The project would be funded from airport funds and <br />would not come from the City's general fund. <br />Comm <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to authorize a contract as recommended. 10/10/73 <br />Approve <br />- -- -..- - - - -, <br /> <br />Councilman Murray asked why the City should obtain the economic study if there is' I <br />possibility of County ownership. Manager explained that regardless of ownership <br />the information will be needed. It will help the County in consideration of owner- _ , <br />ship. If the facility stays with the City, projections on earning capacity and . <br />how it will be accomplished will be necessary in facing future capital improvements. <br />Assistant Manager added that the study would also help in renegotiating contract <br />with air carriers. <br /> <br />.In answer to Councilman Wood, Manager said the contract provides for completion of <br />:the study 90 days from date of notice to proceed. <br /> <br />,Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell expressed concern about the trend of transferring pUblic <br />facilities and attendant responsibilities to fewer elected officials, referring <br />to Lane County's three commissioners versus the City's eight council members, re- <br />'cent transfer of the jail, current consideration of the airport, and future possi- <br />bility of County library system. Councilman Wood noted-,the regional nature of <br />the facilities mentioned. Mayor Anderson observed that thE!Commissioners serve <br />'on a compensated full-time basis. <br /> <br />E..Appeal from Planning Commission denial of rezoning, Earl Green property north <br />of Kins Row, south of I-10S - From RA to R-2 PD (October 2, 1973) <br />Mrs. Bea1 moved seconded by Mr. Wood to schedule public hearing at November 5,1973 <br />Council meeting. Motion carried, all council members present voting aye except _, Comm . <br />Mr. Hershner abstaining. )0/10/73 - <br />Approve <br /> <br />Councilman Hershner said he would abstain on any matter relating to this issue <br />since his-law firm represents Earl Green. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />3' S 10/23/73 - 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.