Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~.. . -.-.,-----,.- Mr. williams said it was a different situation-in that no other ,_~ _ u' <br />endorsement. <br />auditorium existed in the community, and if the facility had been built it would <br />.have been owned by the City. Councilman Hershner also had concerns abou~ endorsing <br />..one business endeavor as opposed to another, either profit or nonprofit. _- <br />Councilwoman Beal suggested endors~ment of the concept on an individual basis there~ <br />by indicating no intent to influence the Room Tax Committee. Manager suggested <br />the endorsement might be defined as approval of the idea but not endorsement of <br />the use of room tax funds. He felt the City many times was involved in providing <br />support for and endorsement of private enterprise types of activities. He men- <br />tioned the new hotel development proposed in the downtown area, recently considered <br />by the Council, and said the Renewal.Agency is actively pushinq for that project. <br />M Campbell revised her motion, seconded by Mr. Murray, that the Council ~ndorse <br />rs . , " th' t t t <br />the concept of the roller skating rink, specify~ng ~t ~s not ~ ~n en , 0 ~n- <br />fluence in any way the funding decision of the Room Tax Allocat~on Comm~ttee. <br />Councilman Keller felt there ~ould still be a problem be~ause funding ,would still <br />t 'nto the iscue Favorable Council vote on the mot~on would be ~nterpreted as ( <br />en er ~ ., . , ,,' " <br />support. He concurred in approval of the concept but felt ~t was play~ng ga~es, <br />with funds. Councilman McDonald also expressed support for the concept but d~dn t <br />like the idea of in~tiating funding of the facility. <br />Mr. Keller moved seconded by Mr. williams that the request for endors~ent be ~abled <br />until disposition of the application for room tax funds is kn~wn. Mot~on c~rr~ed, Comm e <br />Councilmen Beal, Williams, McDonald, Hershner, and Keller vot~ng aye; Counc~lmen 10)17/73 <br />Campbell, Murray, and Wood voting no. Approve <br />Manager suggested having information with regard to status of the app~ic~tion avail- <br />,able for Council members at the october 23 Council meeting. On q~est~on~ng from. <br />Councilman Keller, Mr. Edwards said the Room Tax Committee 'had rejected th~ appl~ca- <br />tion because of legal problems concerning whether the applicant was a prof~t or <br />'nonprofit organization. <br />- Councirwoman Beal suggested reconsideration. She said that although she voted at committee <br />to table the issue, after having read the motion made by Councilwoman Campbell she felt that <br />action in no way would prejudice funding of the skating runk by the Room Tax Allocation Com- <br />mittee. <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to approve the concept of the roll-on <br />skating rink as stated in the motion made by Mrs. Campbell (see above). <br />Councilman Williams questioned procedure - first, whether one who seconded a motion had to <br />vote on the prevailing side; second, if the matter was to be reconsidered there would be a <br />question about when concerns were to be discussed. <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to reconsider the committee action. Motion . <br />carried unanimously. <br />Councilwoman Campbell noted the presence of proponents of the rink proposal and asked if <br />they could be heard. <br />Bobby Edwards, 885 East 37th Avenue, said the intent of those proposing the roll-on skating <br />rink was merely to make the Council aware of the project and to gain its endorsement. He <br />said if it was going to cause controversy they would prefer that a letter be written endors- <br />ing the concept of the rink to be signed by individual Council members supporting the <br />proposal. In that manner formal endorsement by the Council as a body would not be involved. <br />There was general agreement on this approach. Councilman McDonald noted rejection of the <br />application by the Room Tax Committee because of question about the organization's being <br />profit or nonprofit. He asked if the City Attorney could give some opinion on that question. <br />Mayor Anderson explained that the method of financing was not under consideration, only the <br />sentiment of public leadership to enable the sponsoring group to go ahead with the project. <br />Councilman Hershner asked if the statement to be drafted for presentation to individual <br />Council members would be on the concept of the skating rink only and not taking a position <br />on whether the City should or should not assist in funding. He said he had been contacted - <br />since the committee meeting with at least an indication that private enterprise was <br />interested in the proposal if there was public funding. Mayor Anderson said it was his <br />understanding that the letter was to be included with others from leaders in the community <br />supporting the project and had nothing to do with funding. <br />Councilman McDonald said he supported the concept but would not endorse the idea of initiat- <br />ing funding. <br />- <br /> 3\, 10/23/73 - 8 <br /> - <br />