Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mrs. Niven suggested. that, if bothgr>oups.are included, they both should be included on a <br />case-by-case basis. As it reads now, only the disabled group is suggested for inclusion <br />on that basis. Mr. Williams did not conceive of elderly as being anyone over 50. <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Wood to adopt Item 1 but not include the elderly at this <br />point in time. - <br />Mrs. Niven commented that there would be only about 130 in the elderly group and they seem <br />to be far worse off; they are hanging on by their teeth. . <br />Mrs. Campbell amended seconded by Mrs. Beal to include single people oyep 50 ltving ih homes <br />valued at $20,000, and with less than $3,000 income, <br />Vote was taken on the amendment, all council.members presentvoting'aye except Mr, Williams, <br />Kel~~r and W.?o.~'hY'O!~12.~ ~~ ~ _..::\T:9_!e . ~.Cl..S -' .:t.a~.eJl.":~on:-.t.he._jn~tion.~nic~ _carried unanimously. <br /> -- . - ."_. --_.'..-." <br />F. Resolution from Revenue Study Committee Requesting Study of Fee Schedules, Capital Comm <br /> Improvement Financing, and a General Business Tax - Councilman Williams stated I <br /> lO/31/73 <br /> that, on this study, he would like to add, "and potential impact" to the No. 3 AprJ.rove <br /> "To investigate as a new source of revenue, the feasibility I <br /> statement which reads, I <br /> I <br /> of a general business license tax". No objections to this addition were voiced. <br />G. PUll Approval-Hert1ewoOdon Hawkins Heivhts Blvd.-Call hearing'NOv. 26 Comm <br />H . Appeal SigIi BOardPerJiJl tDeIiia1' to GerJiJanSJiJokedMea ts toretainideIiti tysigIi":'Call <br /> . hear iIig . ' .' -10/31/73 I <br />I. Master Airport Plan Amendments as Agreed betweenCountyCommiss.&Airpt.Comm. <br />J~ Package Store License, Corner Cupboard; 4690 Royal Avenue Approve <br />K. Filing Application with LCOG for S.Bank Wi11amette-Pedes.Bike Trail App. Comm . <br /> 10/31/73 <br /> .- -. .... - '~-"---' ... _..,~.. .-- Affirm <br />L.I ReSOlution on Fee'Sche'dules'~~ capital-:i:mprovement Fina.ncing, General Business Tax _ <br /> Councilwoman Campbell at the request of Lee Penny, Budget Committee chairman, Comm <br /> , asked postponement of discussion on this resolution. Mrs. Penny felt the Budget 10/24/73 <br /> : subcommittee on revenues should review the resolution prior to Council discussion. , Affirm <br /> ! It was agreed the matter would be b+ought back ano.ther time. -~-~~~~ . <br /> '~- - -,-._~- --- .. - ~.. . _. ~ . - <br />M.~Planning Study on_Commercial Zones - Mayor Anderson repeated his thinking that <br /> consideration.-:of ~,the Valley River/Montgomery Ward rezoning issue was based on a <br /> General Plan contiti'ning ambiguities and contradictions which made judgments diffi- <br /> cult and often led to subjective rather than Objective evaluation. As a resul t of Comm <br /> concerns with regard to development of .the total area - downtown and the Good- 10/24/73 <br /> pasture Island area - the Council did call for a study of commercial uses in the Affirm <br /> (area north of Valley River Center. The Mayor felt broader implications and broader <br /> City responsibilities were involved and that any study undertaken on that area <br /> should be related to the entire region. He suggested that instructions to the <br /> Planning Commission for enlargement upon the study request, or at least an ex- <br /> planation of what would be a desirable result of that study, should include (1) a <br /> definitive statement on the relationship of Valley River to the downtown area, I <br /> recognizing the definite interrelationship between the two areaSI (2) statement. <br /> of timing of development in the two areas; and (3) a request that both the Com- . <br /> mission and Lane County make no further major zoning decision in the Goodpasture <br /> Island area until the study is completed. <br /> Mayor Anderson emphasized the areawide significance of zoning decisions, that it <br /> is not a "Eugene only" concern. He also emphasized that his suggestions were not <br /> to b'e interpreted as "...after the horse'is out..." concern, since it was his fee1-' <br /> ing the Commission's decision on the Moran property and the COU~9i~-decision on <br /> Montgomery~'~rezoning were based on the 1990 Plan and perfectly in order. He <br /> asked that his suggestion be-given thought with the idea of discussion at the <br /> next CouncLl meeting. <br /> / <br /> , councJl:m;;;;' Williams said it came to his a ttention after the Ward:' s rezoning was I <br /> completed that there was substantial effort on the part of Springfield in the hope <br /> they would gain the Ward 's development if Eugene did not feel the Goodpas,tu~ <br /> Island area was an appropriate location. He wondered whether the community's ~ <br /> interest was best served if it is decided there should be no more development in ~. . <br /> the Goodpasture I~land area until' the Plan is revised and then that development I <br /> occurs at some other location. Mayor Ander90n replied that his suggestion was <br /> brought at this time only to give Council members an opportunity to givelt-somEl- <br /> thought before the next Council meeting at which time further refinements could <br />, be made. ~. <br />-5 <br />~ <br />, Oouncilwoman Baal noted that the Plan itself is for the metropolitan area so the <br /> Council may want to'consider having planning staffs of Springfield and Lane County <br /> as well as Eugene work together on the study. Councilmen Murray and Campbell ex- <br /> pressed their support of the Mayor's suggestion. . <br /> It was understood an outline of such study, time frame for completion, etc., would <br /> be put together for discussion at the October 31 committee meeting. <br /> 11/5/73 - 10 . <br /> '?>3'1 <br />