01/28/1974 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Public hearing was held with no testimony presented other than David Petersen, planning consultant representing the applicant offering to answer questions. Council Bill No. 433 - Rezoning area west of Belt Line Road north of Royal Avenue to RA Suburban Residential was read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. 01.- Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that findings supporting the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission minutes of October 2, 1973 and December 4, 1973 and in appli- cant's statement of December 4, 1~73, allan-file-in the-'--Cj.~t-yc-Rec_order's of:f.ice, beadqpted by reference thereto; -~hat the-.~0iincil bill be read the seeond time by' eouncil bill number only, with 'unanimous_conse~t 0f theC0uncil; and that ' enact:fnent be considered at this time-. Motion carried unqnimousfy>and~the bill was read the second time' by councll'nill number only. .. -_- . -- _-I- - -~ ._ . Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16967. 2. North of 1st Avenue between Madison and Monroe - From M-2,to R-2 and from R-2 to RG-2.5-SR with sign district designation of Residential (Peck) Recommended by the Planning Commission on December 11, 1973. Council viewed on tour. Planning staff notes and minutes were previously distributed to Council members. The proposed rezoning would provide additional off-street parking north and in back of the present restaurant and change the existing industrial zone on property to the west to one more compatible to current use of the property and those adjacent. .' Public hearing was held with no testimony presented other than Dean Owens, attorney representing the applicant, offering to answer questions. Council Bill No. 434 - Rezoning area north of 1st Avenue between Madison and Monroe Streets to R-2 and RG-2.5-SR with sign district designation of Residential was read by council bill number and title only, there being no council- man present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that findings supporting rezoning of the prop- erty as set out in Planning Commission minutes of December 11, 1973 and on file in the Recorder's office be adopted by reference thereto; that the cO,uncil bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and ~hat enactment be considered at this time. Councilman Murray expressed concern about trees on the property. He thought an attempt should be made to preserve some of them to provide a barrier between the parking lot and residential properties. Manager noted the site review provision in the rezoning action. He explained the petitioner would be required to use the conditional use procedure in de- veloping the property which would give the hearings official the opportunity to set such conditions as he would feel appropriate. Vote was taken on the motion for adoption of findings and second reading as stated. Motion carried unanimously, and the bill was read the second time by councilbill number only. - 0216 Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote'. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16968. C. Sign District Changes 1. South of 28th Avenue and east of Oak Street - From Residential to Integrated Neighbor- hood (Wilson) Recommended by the Planning Commission on December 4, 1973. Planning staff notes and Commission minutes were previously distributed to Council members. The proposed sign district was felt to be compatible with uses of the neighborhood to the west and north. 0225 Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. Council Bill No. 435 - Change of sign district on area south of 28th Avenue east of Oak Street to Integrated Neighborhood was read by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. -~~." -.~ , Mr. Hershner moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that findings supporting the sign district change as set out in Planning staff notes and Commission minutes of December 4, 1973 and on file in the City Recorder's office be adopted by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was 'read the second time ?y counc~l bill number only._ ,~ 1/28/74 - 2