Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.~- <br /> <br />Mr. Murray ~oted the amount of space available in the Armory building with poten- <br />tial use for meeting rooms, office space, etc. It was hoped that before any deci~ <br />sion was made on the outcome of the building there would be public discussion on <br />, the issue. It was recognized that restoration could be costly although the degree <br />of cost to some extent would be determined by the use to which the building even- <br />tually ~uld be put. New construction costs, he said, would almost surely be more, <br />than any restoration costs, particularly if cost of land acquisition was included. <br />It was his understanding that the building could remain at its present location <br />: without interfering with the proposed County public service building on the same <br />!block, and possibly could be incorporated into that building. Mr. Murray noted <br />: statements from County Commissioner Hayward indicating the resolution, if adopted <br />by the City, would be forwarded to the County's Vision 2000 committee, charged <br />with helping the County to plan its public service building, thereby giving an <br />opportunity for further discussion in the public sector. <br /> <br />, <br />i <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell said the chairman of the LCOG Arts Advisory Committee had <br />suggested alternate uses to which the building could be put - art shows, photo- <br />:graphic shows, commercial exhibits, Saturday Market - all of which required large <br />areas of uninterrupted space, and all of which would be revenue producing in <br />:that they would pay rental charges. Councilman Keller concurred in the remarks. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />In answer to questions from Councilwomen Baal and Campbell as to why the building <br />could not be used now, Manager said the County had spent considerable money to <br />'make it usable for the kind of use it now has. However, the fire code would not <br />permit large'gatherings without a great deal of remodeling. Assistant Manager <br />added that there are limitations on the numbers of people who can work in the <br />building; major problems involve all utility systems in the building. <br /> <br />'Mayor Anderson asked whether the proposal was reviewed by lay members of the <br />[Historical Committee. He also expressed concern that the resolution as now ~ <br />written would seem to co~t the Council to the preservation of the building <br />:without having information on economical and structural aspects. He wondered <br />tif the resoluti~n could contain some qualifications. Councilman Murray said <br />,lay members of the commi ttee asked that the matter be brought to the Council's <br />:attention, since the committee did not feel its charge was to deal with individual <br />;items. He felt it absurd to interpret the resolution as committing the City to <br />;restoration regardless of circumstances, and said there would be other factors <br />:raised in consideration of its preservation. Councilman Keller said he had no <br />;objection to adding some qualification to the resolution since the intent was <br />:to get it to the County Commissioners as quickly as possible, realizing it might <br />'be impossible to preserve the building. <br /> <br />Comm <br />lL/16/74 <br />Approve <br /> <br />iMrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to amend the resolution, adding at the end <br />the words "if economically feasible.," -Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on adoption of the resolution as amended. Motion carried unanimously. . <br />..... -.- -.-,---------......,..--..--... ._.._-_.:._~---_..._. -- - - '-'-"-~'. ...........-....---.-.-...> . .,...----..-..- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />D. i~recker's 'License, Machinery Exchange, 2750 Roosevelt Boulevard - Application submitted!Comm. <br />:by Geo. L. and Emily K. Zellner. Staff recommended approval. ..'-:-lkft6/7i. <br /> <br />i, x~~ <br />iMr. Wood moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to recommend approval of the application. Motio~L! <br />;_c'3.~~~~<!._Z:1!:~nillrJl.~sly. n-_.__-C-'- --'''____'n' . ...._._nn_____,__. _.___.______ n___'~' <br /> <br />1142 <br /> <br />E. : Goodpasture Island Land Use - Because of the ordinance providing a six-monthsuspension~ <br />by the planning Commission of consideration of any zone changes or annexations in <br />the Goodpasture ISI~~d Road area applications were filed directly with the Council for: <br /> <br />:~. Rezoning from AGT to C-2-PD 7.04 acres south and west of Goodpasture Island <br />Road north of Valley River to accommodate Eugene lXJdge (Smith,Brown,Howell); and <br /> <br />[2. Annexation of 42.9 acres lying north of and across Goodpasture Island Road from <br />the K-Mart development, represented as the proposed site for an ice skating <br />arena, a four-section theatre, and a G.I.Joe store (lXJerksen, Emerald Delta,Inc.) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Manager noted that the area proposed for rezoning to accommodate Eugene Dodge was <br />part of the "Hosey" rezoning request previously tabled by the Council. He added <br />i that comments on the agenda distributed to Council indicating the request could <br />not be referred,to the Planning Commission without amending the ordinance were <br />, misleading. He said the limited area submitted in this application could be <br />substituted for the entire area covered by the Hosey application and removed from <br />the table for Council consideration. However, Planning Commission consideration <br />of the PD..(planned development) suffix would be required. <br /> <br />Manager continued that the annexation request submitted by Doerksen would not by <br />State law require Commission consideration. However, precedent and City procedures <br />, would indicate all annexations are referred to the Commission. Purpose of the ~ <br />~.._._----. . J _.~_~_------..:.___:--__~_~____~-::-- <br /> <br />'2.'2. <br /> <br />1/28/74 - 9 <br />