My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/31/1974 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1974
>
01/31/1974 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:43:04 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:14:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/31/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-,\ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Assistant Manager in response to question raised about ownership of the property from <br />which Mr. Braatz was having trees removed said there was no information in that regard. <br />With regard to question whether that cutting would have been prevented had the current <br />ordinance been in effect, Assistant Manager said the ordinance merely would have re- <br />quired that a permit be obtained. Whether it would have prevented what occurred was not <br />known, only that a process would have been followed before issuance of a permit. <br /> <br />Councilman Wood suggested that an opportunity be provided for interested persons in the <br />City to examine the ordinance and present their evaluation before it was adopted. <br />Councilman McDonald opposed the provision of the ordinance which would require a permit <br />for cutting of any individual tree in the City. However, he felt something should be <br />done to ensure cessation of cutting in the South Hills, still leaving the opportunity <br />for proper development of properties, in that area. Councilman Hershner said his views <br />were the same as he expressed previously in committee, and he felt Mr. Gleaves' stand <br />valid with regard to indefensibility of the ordinance as now written. <br /> <br />Mr. Hershner moved seconded by Mr. Keller to refer the ordinance back to the <br />tree preservation subcommittee for consideration of testimony presented at <br />this meeting. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal supported referral, hoping an ordinance would be returned at an early <br />date. She regretted the appearance of legislating for an emergency but felt adoption <br />of an ordinance was important to preserve the aesthetic qualities of the city. She <br />thought too the individual property rights should be considered saying she was not sure <br />but that the restrictions should only apply to vacant or undeveloped properties. <br /> <br />In answer to questioning by Councilman Murray, it was explained that an ordinance con- <br />taining the emergency clause (which provides that it becomes effective immediately upon <br />passage) must have six affirmative vot~s. Without the emergency clause it could be <br />adopted by majority vote. However, no 'ordinance can be adopted at the same meeting at <br />which it is introduced without unanimous consent of all Council members present. <br /> <br />Councilman Murray said he was not convinced there was no crlS1S now in view of recurring <br />cutting in the South Hills but that he would go along with referral. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell recounted her efforts in trying to stop the tree cutting in the <br />South Hills at the urging of residents of that area. She said she favored adoption of <br />regulations which would promote preservation of trees in the city, but she had reserva- <br />tions about restrictions on cutting of single trees on individual properties. She <br />noted postponement of adoption was obvious and hoped that postponement would not pro- <br />vide the opportunity for wholesale tree removal in anticipation of pending regulations. <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />Councilman Hershner mentioned the agreement made previously that no further cutting <br />would occur on Mr. Braatz,' property. He said the property owner has now made a state- <br />ment to that effect in public meeting, so it was clear no more cutting was intended. <br />He hoped the subcommittee would consider the idea of limiting cutting to a certain <br />number of trees in one ownership rather than having the restrictions apply to every <br />individual tree in the city. And he suggested there might be some merit in licensing <br />people cutting trees for pay to help control cutting of trees on the basis of erroneous <br />advice. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Beal suggested inclusion of trees on parking strips in the restrictions. <br />Councilman Williams asked that specific suggestions be submitted in writing to the sub- <br />committee for its consideration when working on redraft of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams congratulated the Council for its action, saying it would result in <br />more prudent legislation than would have been adopted through hasty action. <br />\, <br /> <br />Upon motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned. <br /> <br />.,~~ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />A. K. Martin <br />Assistant City Manager <br /> <br />3~ <br /> <br />. 1/31/74 - 3, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.