Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Counc-ilman Wood felt alloea-Bon -to the Track Club was a leg-itimate use of room tax <br />funds in that there is a reciprocal benefit from the University to the community <br />in the way of tourist and student trade. He felt the Boys Clubs of great benefit <br />to youth in the community. In answer to Mrs. Beal, Mr. Wood said he would as <br />readily support allocation to a similar type activity for girls. should it be requested., <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />~- <br /> <br />Councilman Williams said he was impressed with activities of the Boys Clubs organiza- <br />tion in the East and thought their problem in this area had been in establishing a <br />financially sound basis. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to approve the recommended <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/6/74 <br />Approve <br />allocations. .: <br /> <br />'In making the motion, Mrs. Campbell remarked that she had reservations about holding <br />money in the room tax fund. Also, 'that applications had been investigated by the <br />Room Tax Committee and its recommendations should be accepted. <br /> <br />'Vote was takeno~:,t;he. ~tj.q!1,..~~.stated .f1ption, carr);.,.fj;<1:.,>unanimously. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Councilman Murray asked that the record show his abstention from votlng on the allocation <br />to the Oregon Track Club. <br /> <br />,07-73 <br /> <br />E. ;7JUTaelTiies"'for"Allocations, Transient Room Tax - copies-were 'previously i~rnisheci: .., <br />! Council members of suggested guidelines for allocations of room tax revenues to- i <br />Lgether with defini tions of purposes established for use of the funds. Staff recom-_ '\ <br />mended referral to the Room Tax Allocation Committee for suggestions they might i <br />feel helpful to the Council in considering adoption of the guidelines. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />i <br />Cornrn <br />2/~/74 <br />Approve <br /> <br />.,,_. - .._____~'"'--. .-",_' ..,__.._......._... .. _,_,,_~,_ __,.______,,,, _.,.____. _'.0 ~_ ._._.___ 'O"~-j <br /> <br />F. icounty Library System - Letter from Lane County Commissioner Omlid together with sug- <br />\gested program and budget for proposed county-wide library system were distributed <br />')previously to Council members. Staff took the position that there was not enough <br />tinformation about the proposal and its effect on the City's library program to give <br />~an intelligent resppnse as to whether the City would co-operate in a County-wide <br />'[system should it be approved by the voters. Commissioner Omlid suggested-a meeting <br />'of the Library Board and/or the Council with the County Library Committee before a <br />position was taken, but he was hopeful a position would be stated as soon as possible <br />.since it was desired to place the issue on the May primary ballot and deadline for <br />ballot title approval was March 15. Staff recommended referral to the Library Board ] <br />for a r!!99mmenda,tion-,~~_o transmi-t,ting the suggestion that-~uncil members be in- <br />vited .to participate in deliberations of the Board with the Courity,Committee with <br />regard to questions such aswhat would happen under the proposed sy~-t~ to the City <br />staff and building ownership and maintenance.. Also to be considered wob]'d~be the <br />disposition of facilities should a special levy be approved now but rejected in <br />;future elections. <br />, <br />I <br />:Mrs.Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the Library <br />~County-wide libra~y system proposal and~bring recommendations <br />'carried unanimously. <br /> <br />i Councilman wood questioned the suggestion (No.9) for denial of funds to applicants <br />, having as a part of their program the teaching of a religious ideology. He could <br />; see the possibility of church-sponsored programs, such as housing, which would not <br />. necessarily be teaching the ideology of that church. He also wondered whether the <br />requirement (NO.3) that programs be predominantly recreational, cultural, convention; <br />or tourist related to receive funds should indicate ~lso social or educational areas. \ <br />" <br />.Mrs. Campbell noted that the Charter amendment covering the room tax spelled out the i <br />jbases for uses of the revenues. <br />\ <br />I <br />lMr. Hershner <br />ithe Room Tax <br />1 unanimously. <br /> <br />L. _'O. 'O" __._____.~._. ~.. <br /> <br />moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to refer the suggested guidelines to <br />Allocation Committee for comment and suggestions. Motion carried <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Board consi~the <br />" <br />to the Council. Motion <br /> <br />t ~-~. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Campbell offered information she had accumulated to other Council member~ <br />,and hoped they would meet with the County Committee to become familiar with the pro- <br />posed system. Mrs. Weaver'f_speaking for Katherine Eaton, chairman of the county Com- <br />"mi.ttee-;--;"oted seminar---scJleduled for February 23 on the proposal and meeting of the <br />~county Committee scheduled for Tuesday, February 12. Consensus was that staff would <br />1 ' . <br />\con:~ct co~ncil members to determine which one could meet wi th the _ County cOmHI~ ttee // <br />or ~ts cha~rman. '. . ". ... ,. ..- <br /> <br />Cornrn <br />2/6/74 <br />Approve <br /> <br />e: <br /> <br />G.Roosevel t Freeway (Highway 126) Funding -Copies of-"letter were previously dist~ibuted <br />:to Council members from Fred Klabaoe, administrator and State highway engineer for <br />:Oregon State Highway Division, with regard to changes in the 1973 Federal Highway Act. <br />The only Fedralfunds available for a project such as the westerly extension of High- <br />,Wgy 126 from Washington and .Jefferson Streets are Federal-Aid Primary urban extension <br />J.unds. Mr. Klaboe advised that the change in the 1973 Act eliminated funds previously <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />41 <br /> <br />2/11/74 - 8 <br />