|
<br />.
<br />
<br />those items upon which there might be szib;;tantiv~~ changes desired. He explained
<br />that results of the subcommittee meetings with the Association would be brought
<br />back to the full Council for consideration and, at:, that time there would be oppor-:-
<br />;tunity for further input from those interested. In answer to Mr. Murray as to.
<br />(how decisions would be reached in meetings between the subcommittee and the
<br />:Assaciation members should there be difference ol~ opinion, Mayor Anderson said
<br />I' . .
<br />lthe Cauncil subcommittee opinion on what would be brought back to the Council
<br />:would be final. He added that it should be understood that what was necessary
<br />'for the most part was only upgrading of the document in the'way it was written,
<br />and it was fel t tha t could be worked out wi th members af the Associa tion. The
<br />few points' on which there seemed to be Council disagreement would be isolated
<br />:and brought back for debate before the full Council.
<br />r
<br />
<br />jcouncilwoman Campbell said her "no" vote on referring the Plan to a subcommittee
<br />,was because of concern that there would be substantive change in the content.
<br />:Councilwoman Beal commented on the need for a very clear, concise document since
<br />. i t would no doubt be the prototype for many more plans to follow from ather
<br />neighbarhaad graups in the City. She reminded ather Council members that the
<br />Cauncil's decision with regard to. City policy was fin~l regardless of the Laurel
<br />Hill people's desires.
<br />I
<br />
<br />.'-'
<br />,.
<br />"",~.J
<br />
<br />'In answer to. Councilman Keller, Mayor Anderson said it was possible that policy ~
<br />:items an which there was disagreement cau1d become neighbarhaad prapasa1s. Or
<br />:if the Laurel Hill people did not want it that way, they would have the appar- I
<br />~tu~i_~y JO!...._~~1?!f t~.E.~~are the entire Council when the Plan was braught back. /
<br />-.,.--., ---"'~-~" .- - ~. '-.-.-- --.._-_. -.--..-.-.-----.------~._,__,...._..._ '-""0" .__... ~__._~_----.I
<br />
<br />M~ ,Appointments, Boards and Commissions
<br />:Sign Code Board of Appeals - Mike Feig, 345 East
<br />term ending January
<br />Reappo~ntment for one-year t~rm:
<br />Plumbing Board Ma1ca1m Manley, 2550 Warren Street
<br />Rabert Fegles, Route 5, Box 1083
<br />R. K. Livingstan, 431 East 34th Avenue
<br />Warner Dallas, 110 Green Acres Road
<br />Joel Goss, 151 North 4th Street, Springfield
<br />Boxing Commission - Donald R. Barker, 2065 Law Lane'
<br />Hugh Luby, 1730 West 28th Avenue
<br />W. W. Porter, 1351 Jeffersan Street
<br />Frank Riggs, 2040 Agate Street
<br />Dr. Leland Stauffer, 661 Sberling Drive
<br />
<br />.,~
<br />~~
<br />50th Avenue, for balance of \
<br />1,1976
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />,
<br />~Councilwoman Beal asked ahout the'duties of the P.lumbing Board.
<br />!p~ained that primafi1y the group acts as a baard of appeals in
<br />:l~censes and enforcement administratian af the plumbing code.
<br />r are set by ordinance (two plumbing can tractors , tlvO jaurneymen
<br />:ane member fram the public at large).
<br />
<br />J
<br />
<br />It was ex-
<br />the issuance af
<br />Qualifications
<br />plumbers, and
<br />
<br />J
<br />; Mrs.. Beal maved secanded by Mr. Woad to canfi rm the appaintments.
<br />;ried unanimausly.
<br />1~.____._....._.__..__._.l__
<br />
<br />Motian car-
<br />
<br />Camm
<br />3/20/74
<br />Affirm
<br />
<br />;:-:-::: -:--':._'-~'''' - -~-
<br />
<br />.._.J
<br />
<br />N. !prapasal far Bicycle Ca-ardinatar - Capies af letter (3/4/74) fram Ben Pascal, I
<br />,member af the Bicycle Cammi ttee, were previausly distributed to. Cauncil members. i
<br />:Mr. Pa'scal prapased the emplayment af a biCYCle co-ardinatar, a professianal
<br />'assigned to traffic engineering to guide citizen lnembers in their palicy-making
<br />rale and shaulder much af the wark naw carried by miscellaneous staff members.
<br />It was understaad the prapasal wauld be referred to. staff far review and recam-
<br />~Jll~n_c!~!i-.Q!1.,.. _.__.._.._.___.___..... _.._c~~"~,,....._'c \. ."..J".... .-...., '..=.";': '-.. .."7"..=,~,----:._.-.-. .."z::-.-.--...:.----.'(i/----=)
<br />
<br />Camm
<br />3/20/74
<br />Affirm
<br />
<br />0., County Library System Prapasa1 - Archie DuGuid, chairman af the Library Board, had~
<br />. suggested that the Board meet with the Cauncil at a Wednesday naan meeting an
<br />March 27 or later for discussian of the proposal far Caunty library system. It
<br />: was agreed that staff wauld schedule the discussion far the near future.
<br />
<br />..comm
<br />3/20/74
<br />iAffirm
<br />j
<br />
<br />.-
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />P. i Report, Deferral af Collection of Assessments for Ecanomic Hardship - Manager . ,
<br />noted previous distribution of staff report with regard to. deferring callectian \
<br />af a~sessments far impravement projects in cases af econamic hardship. Mayor \
<br />. Andersan suggested delay af actian an the report unti'l full co:;ncil was in '.
<br />attendance.
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />Caunci1waman Bea1 said that experience in ather cities having pravision .far
<br />: assessment collectian deferral indicated many people did nat apply far hards~ip
<br />i deferral because of interest rate an the deferments. She suggested explarat~an
<br />; the possibility of either exempting elderly peaple from the interest payment ar "
<br />I charging a lawer rate. She mentianed the passi~ni ty af ch~rging interes~ an a
<br />. dawnward scale to. no. interest accrual after a f~ve-y'ear ..p'erJ.ad, ar assessJ.ng
<br />
<br />af
<br />
<br />86
<br />
<br />3/25/74 - 7
<br />
|