Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1405 <br /> <br />In answer to Councilman Wood, Mr. Saul said there was a high concentration of <br />low-income housing in the ,west E~gene area, noting the various developments <br />categorized as that, type' of housing. He did not know the ,specific acreage in <br />undeveloped R-2~ ln answer to Mrs. Beal, but said there were five tracts west of <br />City View. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr~,Rexius said it had been stated several times that he would not accept develop- <br />ment under site review procedures. He said he had not rejected site review and <br />~hat site review ~ad,not been mentioned, to him. ' He did not feel he could, develop <br />the property und~rplanned unit procedures but might be able to work with site <br />review if he.knew what 'it involved. He said that although there mi,ght be available <br />undeveloped R-2 land in the western portion of the city there was only one directly <br />across the street in the immediate area, and he didri't know whether low-rental <br />units were planned for that parcel. He noted the number of assessments for street <br />improvement and sewers and felt his property had to be developed to meet those <br />costs. He felt the property should be developed in conformity with the 1990 Plan. <br />Recognizing the lack of :facilities for higher density, he said, he would not de- <br />. velop the property beyond single-family density. He said he was trying to avoid <br />future problem of single-family housing sandwiched between multiple-family and <br />industrial uses. <br /> <br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony. <br /> <br />1465 <br />. <br /> <br />Councilman Wood said he was opposed to any further low~income type development in <br />that area. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to deny the appeal and uphold <br />the Planning Commission decision denying the rezoning to R-2, and to adopt <br />findings supporting the denial as set forth in Planning Commission staff <br />notes and minutes of March 5, 1974. Motion carried unanimously, Councilman <br />Keller not present. " <br /> <br />1480 <br /> <br />B. Zone Change west' of Coburg Road north of Country Club Road - From RA and C-2 to <br />C-2 SR (Zellner)(Z 74-5) <br />Planning Commission recommended approval March 12, 1974. Manager reported request <br />from petitioner for postponement to. April 22 Council me.eting because he could not <br />be present at this meeting. Legal advertisement was cancelled and staff recommended <br />postponement. <br /> <br />1493 <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to postpone the hearing to <br />April 22. Motio~ ~arried un~nimously, Councilman Keller not present. <br /> <br />C. Sign District Boundary Change west of Coburg Road north of Country Club Road - <br />From Residential and Highway Oriented to Highway Oriented and Outlying Commercial <br />(Rodman) (SDBC 74-2) , <br />Planning Commission recommended approval March 12, 1974. Planning Commission minutes <br />and staff notes. were previously distributed to Council members and made a part of this <br />record by reference thereto. Councilman Williams indicated his intent to abstain from <br />voting on this issue. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 496 - Changing Sign District Boundary west of Coburg Road <br />north of Country Club Road to Highway Oriented and <br />Outlying Commercial was read by council bill number and <br />title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Hershner moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that findings. supporting the Sign District <br />Boundary Change as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of <br />March 12, 1974 be adopted 'by reference thereto; that the bill be read the second time <br />,by council bill, number only, with unanimous consent of the Council; and that enactment <br />be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the <br />second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />,Mr. Hershner moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and glven final <br />passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, except Mr. Williams <br />abstaining (Councilman Keller not present), the bill was declared passed and numbered <br />17028. <br /> <br />1534 <br /> <br />D. Code Amendments <br />1. Section 9.706(2) <br /> <br />2. Section 9.721 - <br /> <br />To allow 10 days for submission of written findings by <br />Hearings Official <br />To provide for elapse of one year before refiling of an identical <br />of substantially identical request for conditional use permit in <br />event of a denied application <br /> <br />L ____ <br /> <br />\01 <br /> <br />4/8/74 - 5 <br />