|
<br />_ __._.....___.,._.J__.
<br />
<br />Councilman Hershner referred to previous consideration of this program and
<br />recollected that costs of participation in the program made it not worth-
<br />,while. Also, that it was decided there were too few properties in the city
<br />'apt to flood to make it worth staff time and cost. Public Works Director
<br />answered that at the time of previous consideration it was not mandatory
<br />,for flood plain zoning. It is now and will involve about a four-ye8:r process.
<br />Assistant Manager added that unless the city qualified for the subsidized
<br />flood insurance, property owners, including the city itself, would be pre- "
<br />'-;
<br />eluded from g~tting any relief. Too, without flood plain zoning there would " C
<br />b F d 1 t.. . . 1 omm
<br />e no e era par ~c~pat~on ~n any land purchases or subsidized programs such5A29/74
<br />.as FHA. A I
<br />~prove
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />, .
<br />D. ; Easement, Storm Sewer from Bedford Plot to the east - Authorization was re-
<br />: queste~ for purchase of storm sewer from John and Soffina Meeks ',...$47S.00,
<br />'and Sk~p and Dorothy Hathaway - $484.00. Cost would be primarily for,damages
<br />: to planted areas to allow extension of the drainage system to connect Oakway
<br />,Road along the north edge of the Oakmont property betweenPioneer'Pike and
<br />Frontier Park.
<br />
<br />Mr. Wood moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to approve the easement
<br />purchase as requested. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />'comm
<br />5/29/74
<br />Approve
<br />
<br />. .. .._ ,,',_,. :- _. . '. .' ,_-:-.-::".......~ '. . > ,J.. , ':J.. 4. __ "_.~ ~ ,.'
<br />E. lEasemen+;, pede'stl::1.an and Bicycle path,-"viifLe-ii'River .:;' Accept,ince of' Dlcqc~~ . an'\. ..~
<br />:pedestrian easement along the Willamette River on the west side of Valley River' \
<br />,Center was requested. Aerial, pl}oto of the area was shown and proposed route
<br />pointed out.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to accept the easement
<br />as requested.
<br />
<br />:It was brought out that no plan or proposal was yet developed for a route extend-
<br />;ing north from the one under discussion, so there had been no contact with prop-
<br />erty owners to the north for easement. Also, that the easement presented for
<br />acceptance would provide a path along the top of the riverbank. Public Works
<br />Director noted that the location of the path was in line with Planning Commis-
<br />:sion and Council requirements for the ,Montgomery Ward planned unit development.
<br />
<br />Vote was taken on the motion to accept the easement. Motion carried
<br />unanimously.
<br />
<br />Comm
<br />5/29/74
<br />Approve
<br />i
<br />
<br />f. :Abatement, 1891 Bailey Hill' Road - Request for abatement action was received
<br />: from the building division of the Public Works Department together with photos
<br />and report on condition of the building. It was understood Council would view
<br />: the site on tour before formal consideration of the request.
<br />
<br />Mr. Hershner moved seconded by Mr. Wood to call public hearing on
<br />the abate~ent. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />edmm
<br />5/29/74
<br />
<br />G. ,Petition, paving and sanitary sewer within Boyd Plat - Petitioned by owners ofA~prove
<br />- . I
<br />lOO% of property to be assessed, a subdivision located off West Amazon Dr~ve. i
<br />
<br />Mrs. Bea1 moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to accept the petition.
<br />Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />comm
<br />5/29/74
<br />I
<br />Approve
<br />
<br />:Petition for sanitary sewer between Stewart Road and 11th Avenue from!
<br />: Bertelsen Road to Amazon Channel - 100%
<br />
<br />Comm
<br />6/5/74
<br />"0' ApPfove
<br />
<br />...,.-..........,. -..-
<br />
<br />H., ,A,reiiJ-wide Planning Co-ordination, s.B.loo - plannj,ng Commission, in response to
<br />referral" by the Counpil, recoImlended that LCOG be designated as the ci ty I S
<br />representative in area-wide planning required under S.B.IOO. Manager explained
<br />that the new legislation, adopted in the 1973 session, allows either the County
<br />to act as area-wide planning co,-ordination body, creation of a regional planning
<br />agency, or LCOG's funotioning in that capacity. Because LCOG is set up for that:
<br />!kindof worj{- and the County is not; the commissioiifelt.'r..CoG' s' designation' would ~
<br />iavoid duplication and nonproductive effort, recognizing that the County 'has the',
<br />iauthority for the final decision.
<br />
<br />--
<br />
<br />,~
<br />
<br />6/iO/74 - i8
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />~
<br />"'"
<br />
<br />.'
<br />
<br />,~
<br />
|