|
<br />~._.- -------'---------~--~- Cost to t~!il'(:)unt~
<br />l_l~~l.~....:L 13i~.:~~~l__- ~>jcct Contract Cost Abutting Prop. Cost to City Budgeted
<br />
<br />7. Cl1vin Street -twmDulles Avenue
<br />co 30G :eet N, :tC\>9)
<br />
<br />I J. Ker,r.Q~h R, :... .,':ick Construction Co.............$ 1,970.10........... .Lat.........$ O,08/Sq.Ft........................0
<br />2, Shur-iJay Cc::c:c..ctors, Inc......................$ 2,483,30 Serv, Line..$409.00 $780.00
<br />J, Norm Greer. C ::,Jns....,.........................$ 2,499,50 Deferred Assessment .
<br />'" h'ildiEh CQ::;,:'llction Company...................$ 2,641.00 (outside city)
<br />Dan Allsup cc..Lractor, Inc.....................$ 4,183.18 . _~
<br />COMPLETION DATE: August 30, 1974 ~
<br />-------------------- -_.._----------------------------------~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,
<br />
<br />t .~T~~~~~2~: ~
<br />e. 2.:ith Avenue fre::: :::~lyard Street to
<br />:\:::a20n Channel (1.....\J1)
<br />
<br />L Shur-Hay Co::cr"ctors, Inc............,........ .$59,616.00........................... .0............................. .$59,616.00....., .$108.000,00
<br />2, Robert L. Jc::..n...................,...........$64,133.60 '(74-75 D"~r::\
<br />J. De':ereaux & ",Cttt, Inc....................... ..$71,466.20
<br />". Kenneth R. 2:itick Construction Co...,.........$78,156.40
<br />5, Dan Allsup 1...:,:l:ractor, Inc................... ..$81,519.52 :
<br />6. Hildish CODotc'Jction Company.................. .$87,221.16 I
<br />COMPLETION DATE: September 27, 1974
<br />-- - ------- ---- --- ------------ - ~ - ----- --- -- ------ -----------------
<br />
<br />Public Horks Director reviewed bids. ,Recommendation was to award contracts to the
<br />low bidder on each proj ect , with the award of contract on Item 4 (Sleepy Hollow
<br />Subdivision) subject to acceptance by the property owner.
<br />
<br />Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. (1424)
<br />
<br />"~:':~ l~r.,)f~;slriier' moved "~~~;nded by 'j@s,~~ Camph~lE"'~-6"award ~c0nt-nq,gj;S <'t9 ';th~~ low - " ,
<br />~-b Idcrer '2iY.~~acli_ pro j ~cii~a:s-- :rE? com.mendeg, - tnf~;.a~ard,.. of . cQntract~ QI:1 It em -J.t:J S) eepy ~ '.-
<br />-, :Hol;L6w,_~Subd~1:sf~nrsU1J~~Qt~to'accepfancelD-f~~he -DId by ,the prop"erty-,owner. ):~,~--
<br />~~ '. .-..,.>:. -',- '.-- - .,= - -- - ~ _ i::, .___-.....::.-.!
<br />:.-= ~ ,...-;;;'--,-
<br />
<br />In response to Councilwoman Campbell, Public -W~rks Director saidthat..Item 8 (25th _
<br />Avenue storm sewer) completed the project in that area and removed the drainage facilities
<br />entirely from Roosev.elt Junior High property. In answer to Councilwoman Beal, he said
<br />that the paving and storm sewer on Meadow LCl.ne (Item 2) was. peitioned by owners of 58%
<br />of the property to be assessed, and that Item 3 (18th Avenue) was initiated by the
<br />Council at staff request and completed the 18th Avenue improvement. .
<br />
<br />Rollcall vote was taken on motion7as stated. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />H. Petition '- Sanitary sewer on Central Boulevard from 28th Avenue to south 1200 feet;
<br />and between Central Boulevard and Spring Boulevard to serve all lots in Hunter's
<br />Haven SUbdivision - 43.03%
<br />
<br />. -~~ - . ~ ,. ... _' .__' ._.~ .~. . ",' '" ~ '_.' ..4"_' _,_~".., _._,
<br />)Petition, Sanitary sewer on, Central Boulevard from '28th Avenue" to south 1200 feet; :
<br />! and between Central Boulevard and Spring Boulevard to serve all lots in ,
<br />Hunter's Haven Subdivision - 43.03%1
<br />;Public Works Director asked for public hearing at this stage rather than at time of
<br />contract award because of the controversial nature of the project. He said in- i
<br />jterested property owners were advised the issue would be before the Council on
<br />! June 24.'
<br />
<br />Mrs. Bool moved seconded by Mr. Wood to schedule pUblic-iieari'ng-at-the 'C' e
<br />24 '1 t . t . . d . 1 ' omm
<br />June Counc~ mee ~ng. Mo ~on carr~e unan~mous y. / /
<br />6 ~9 74
<br />
<br />J Councilwoman Beal expressed the hope that if there were a number of hearings Pub 'Hrng
<br />!scheduled for the June 24 meeting the agenda would be split so that part of it could
<br />; be considered at another time rather than having a lengthy meeting and making deci,- I
<br />,
<br />: sions sO,late in the evening. Mayor Anderson agreed.
<br />
<br />
<br />Public Work:: Director said the project involved about 20 parcels. As a resui,t of
<br />discussion with owners of other properties .(besides-those represented on the petition)
<br />there was now 48% of the properties represented on the petition. Public hearing was
<br />requested at this time rather than at time of contract award. The Director cautioned
<br />the Council about deliberating on percentages when considering petitions fo~ installa-
<br />tion of sewers in view of accepted policy that eventually the entire city would' be
<br />provided with sewer facilities. He noted that some of tQe property owners in the
<br />subject area were protesting installation of this \:~ystem becaus.e they had been permitted
<br />to pump effluent into other ~stems from septic tanks, and that permission could be
<br />;interpreted as a way of avoiding any sewer assessment. Those properties, he said, have
<br />not paid any s ewer assessment although they have been utilizing the " city facilities.
<br />He added that he felt a 48% petition was a reasonable request for sewers, that the city
<br />had to look at its obligation to provide s ewers to everyone in the city. In res pons e to .. "_
<br />th~ Manager, Public Works Director said that the' assumption was correct that any septic '~
<br />tank effluent from that area now or in the future would drain into the Laurelwood golf . ."
<br />course drainage and eventually into,the Amazon Channel.
<br />
<br />Public hearing was opened, the Chair explaining that it was not the final
<br />hearing, and that there would be the opportunity to be heard at that time
<br />of contract award. No testimony was presented and public hearing was closed.
<br />
<br />6/24/74 - .10
<br />
<br />2'8 i
<br />/,
<br />
|