|
<br />~
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />;In making the motion Mr. Murray commented that there' seemed to be no knowledge or
<br />jinvestigation made as to whether such an ordinance existed, or if it did how it worked;
<br />'He didn't think. it would take a great deal of staff time and would give some basis for:
<br />. ~~re serious e~plora:io~ of the iss~e. council~man Beal s,uggested salvaged materials'
<br />. IlUght be used ~n ass~st~ng elderly~n home repa~ror would, be of value to people
<br />:interested in "do-it-yourself" projects. She thought a step ,in that direction would
<br />,ibe of public interest and change the whole philosophy of "tear it down and throw it
<br />away." Mayor Anderson !;aid he was not in any way opposed to salvage if materials
<br />could be used in an economical, aesthetic, and structurally feasible fashion. But
<br />'.be was concerned about spending an undue amount of staff time in administration of
<br />Ian unworkable program. He suggested rather than a lengthy investigation that staff
<br />;merely determine whether such ordinances exist. Consensus was that that was the
<br />Jintent Of, the rrotion. '
<br />
<br />iCouncilman McDonald stated his opposition, saying he 'would not be a part to permit- ,
<br />jting public salvage under conditions where the city would stand liable., Also that "
<br />~use of salvaged materials in construction 'may not be permitted under building depart~ ,
<br />I , _ . .. ,
<br />Iment regulations. He couldn't see any point in delaying demolition to permit salvage :
<br />iof materials which might not be approved for constructin purposes.!
<br />~ x . - ~
<br />I
<br />, Howare Leighty explained that he did not necessarily intend to advocate an i
<br />:ordinance which would ensure delay of demolition for free public salvage. Rather, i
<br />:it was to encourage wreckers-to salvage more materials themselves and reali~e if I
<br />:they didn't they would be required to delay. He' said there were many current pro-
<br />~ ,grams where people actively sought out the type of materials found in older build-
<br />~ ;ings. He recommended further exploration of the suggestion, saying this city could
<br />show national leadership with an ordinance of that type.
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonaid asked about the cost for demolition when time was allowed for
<br />salvage prior to wrecking. Mr. Hunt answered that two bid forms were issued -
<br />one with and one without salvage. ERA tried to sell everything from their build-
<br />ings before demolition:'" fixtures, carpeting, etc. Then it was the contractor's
<br />responsibility. If delay was required for salvage, that became a part of the bid
<br />price. Councilwoman Beal expressed appreciation to Mr. Hunt for the progress ERA
<br />~ had made in salvaging materials.
<br />
<br />Co rom
<br />Vote wa~ taken Qn t~e motion as stated. ,Motion carried, a~l council 6/i9/74
<br />members . present vobng aye., ex.cept.Counc~lman !1cDonald vo_t~!lfJ no. Approve
<br />I
<br />
<br />J ,
<br />/ I.: Community Goals, 1974 - Copies of recommendations from the co~un~ty Goals. 1974 '. ~
<br />, iConference were distributed to Council members~ p~anning Comm~ss~on recommendat~ons \
<br />;on the Goals were expected prior to suggested hear~ngdate of July 8. .
<br />: ~rom
<br />J Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to schedule public- hearing at the. 6/19/':14 I
<br />__ '1, July 8 Council meeting. Motion carried unani~u~::~'>__"__'d'"_''' ". _~....,_' ,ApP~o~~J
<br />
<br />l.__..d...._.....__ ...., ..'"..'........'d_'. "-..., , ...,..,...,...
<br />~ .P'
<br />
<br />J. !Appeal, Denial of rezoning RA to RG-20-SR on North Delta property, M&M Deve~opment j
<br />,planning Commission denied the rezoning on June 4,.1974. Staff notes and,m~nutes
<br />,of that meeting were to be distributed to Council members prior to the suggested
<br />: hearing date of July 22. C
<br />I, OIllIn:
<br />
<br />i Mrs. Beal moved se?onded-bY ~r. Wood to schedule public hearing at the 6/19/74;
<br />'I . M' 't'" , d 'mo sl Approve
<br />July 22 Counc~ meet~ng. 0 ~on carr~e unan~ u y.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />K. I Sidewalk, 2490 Agate Street - Council was asked to initiate construction of sidewalk
<br />!at 2490 Agate Street to complete a gap in the walkway. Contacts with the owner~of
<br />I abutting property seeking voluntary compliance were unsuccessful.
<br />
<br />Corom,
<br />Mr. Wood moved seconded by Mr. Murray to initiate sidewalk construction as.. "
<br />requested. Motion carried unani..mously. ...._, '.._ ,. 6/1.9/74.
<br />."....,... ," '.-j'...... .." .. ....... ,.... Approve
<br />
<br />L iinterim Working Bikewal) Plan - Recommended by the Planning Commission on Mal) 20,1974. '
<br />J . IDarrel Wilburn, assistant traffic engineer, explained that a working plan was a State
<br />;requirement with application for funds. Approval of the proposed route was requested,
<br />. lito allow proceeding with an application. ,
<br />
<br />'Mayor Anderson said it appeared that the path along the east side of the willamette
<br />! River was a path to nowhere. He asked if it should follow the left bank. of the
<br />: River instead. Assistant Manager replied that work was in progress on property I
<br />matters in that area and proposals addressing concerns on fOllowing the east side ,
<br />I
<br />would be brought soon. C !
<br />onnn
<br />6/i9/74
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to approve the interim working bike. Approve
<br />, , d . I ~~
<br />plan. Mot~on carr~e una12;z.p~..~,~y.~__. _._-=-...._,~--_-_-__ _ __.. M'" -....-~
<br />,._~..,._-------_. .-- . , _.------...- - . ':~~..:'.'~'_.P __.' ~._..........,- . .. . ,
<br />
<br />~ 2.2.b 6(24(J4 "' ..17
<br />
|