Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Manager called attention to excerpt from July 3 ~inutes of Lane County Commissioners <br />meeting (copies distributed with agenda). He read a portion of'the excerpt indicating <br />action of the Board withdrawing its letter reques~ing information and firm commitment <br />for use of the Armory beca~se the County will need the spa:e fo~ County use regar~less ~ <br />of whether the Armory remalns. Con~ensus was that any actlon wlthregard to commlttee- 'II' <br />of-the-whole,report would be moot. <br /> <br /> <br />". - I <br />C. Neighborhood Group Recognition - Copies of charters were previously distributed to I <br />Council members for: I <br />1. iLaurelhi11 Valley Citizens Association r <br />2. 'Whiteaker Community Council <br />I <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Murray to accept the charters and Comm <br />recognize the groups 'as representative of those neighborhoods. Motion 6/26/74 <br />carried, all Council members present voting aye, Mrs. Campbell not present. Approve <br /> <br />D. . EWEB Transactions . _ <br />~l~ Quitclaim easement south of Barger Drive between Laveta Lane and Regina Street <br />(Kenneth D. Gilbert) - No longer needed for power lines and no other utility <br />purposes involved. <br />I <br />!~:2,. Deed land east of Laura Street to Lane County for street purposes, retaining . <br />f existing facility easement. Located where extension of couplet north of <br />, Q Street crosses SP right-of-way. ~ <br />Cornm ,. <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to a~thorize both deeds. 6/2~174 <br />Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br /> <br />E.; planning commission Report - June 10, 1974 <br />J",. Vacation of Larkwood Lane on east side of Fox Hollow between 44th Avenue and <br />Larkwood Street (Henry Blair SV 74-2) <br />Planning Commission recommended approval. However, recent information indicated <br />I ,less than 100% agreement by owners of abutting properties, and because of obliga-: <br />tions and liabilities if vacated without total agreement, postponement of con- I <br />sideration was recommended. , <br />I <br /> <br />I Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to postpone public hear- C <br />I ing on the vacation request. Motion carried unanimously. 6/26~~ <br /> <br />'. Approve <br />! 2~ Vacation of portion of Wall~s Street between Stewart Road and West 11th ; <br />I - I . <br />: frontage road (George Wingard SV 74-3) l <br />I Planning Commission recommended approval. The area to be vacated is an un- <br />I , <br />I developed right-of-way in the center of an industrial area, has never been ! <br />used, and has no purpose. __ <br /> <br />3~ utility Easement Vacations ! . <br />'?~ Between 12th and 13th west from Taylor Street (Breeden Bros. EV 74-4) <br />.b'~' Near northwest corner of Obie Street and 11th Avenue (Lanz EV 74-5) ; <br />~~. South side of Stoney Ridge Road east of Agate Street (LaDuke EV 74-6) Cdmm <br /> <br />. bl ' . 6/26/74 <br />Mr. W~lliams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to call pu ~c hear~ng A <br />. , f h 11 . ' d h b1 . t '1 . pprove <br />for cons~derat~on 0 t e Wa ~s Street an tree pu ~c u ~ ~ty <br />easement vacations. Motion carried unanimously.. <br />.. ( <br /> <br /> <br />F. . First Annual Review, 1990 General Plan - Transmitted by the Planning Corrimissi-on -~ <br />for Council recognition and approval of minor revisions as submitted by the Metro- ! <br />politan Area Planning Advisory Committee. They were A-l, 2, and 3 on page 5 of \ <br />,the Review; B-4, 5, and 6 on pages 5 and 6; and C-7, 10-g.h.i.j, and 11 on pages i <br />6 and 7. Because they were minor revisions it was recommended by the co-ordinating\ <br />committee of the area planning commissions (Eugene, Springfield, Lane County) to I <br />delay 1990 Plan amendment process until the 1975 review. ' <br />! i <br />I Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to recognize and tentatively ;. <br />: approve the Plan changes as recommended, but hold formal amendment of the l . <br />I <br />f 1990 Plan until the 1975 review. ." ' <br /> <br />: Councilman Murray said he had thought of the Plan review as a more ambitious pro- , <br />i ject and fel t the minor revisions were a reflection of the inadequacy of staff ' ! <br />support. He hoped other governm~ntal agencies involved would take the same stand. <br />I <br />..._. .~"___." . ," .~.,..~.._..) '""'"...~._r '/ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7/8/74 - 1.2 <br />;;-'243 <br />