My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/08/1974 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1974
>
07/08/1974 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 1:55:17 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:15:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/8/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the motion there was no acknowledgment on the part of the Council that it <br />recognize or expected any variations to occur. Motion carried unanimous.ly. <br /> <br />G. Street Name Change - Lorna Linda Lane (l~~ <br />Legal advertising prior to former Council acti9n making the street name change did .... <br />not occur, and staff recommepded corrective action. ~ <br /> <br />',- Public hearing was, held with no testimony presented. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 603 - ~peati.!!g Ordinance 17071 and renaming portion of 33rd,~~_ <br />34th, and Lorna Linda Drive.to Lorna Lipda Lane was read <br />by council hill'number and title only, there being no councilman present <br />re~uesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded~~y Mrs. Campbell that the bill be read the second <br />time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that <br />enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously, Mr. Hershner <br />not present, and the bill was read for the second time by council bill number only. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell that the bill be approved and given <br />,final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, Councilman <br />Hershner not present, and the bill'was declared passed and n~mbered 17126. <br /> <br />II - Items acted upon with one motion aft~r~discussion of individual items if requested. <br />Previously discussed in committee on Jtme 26, 1974 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council'; - -~ , _ <br />members Williams, Hershner, McDonald, ~Beal, Campbell, Keller, Murray, and Wood) and ~ <br />on July 8, J974 (Present: Mayor Adnerson; Council members Williams, Hershner, Beal, . <br />Campbell, Keller, Murray, and Wood). Minutes of those meetings appear below in italics. <br /> <br />-." ..... '-"--'" <br /> <br />:A. Liquor- 'License Applica dons' , \ <br />,\ ,1. LaMars, 795 Willamette ~ Renewal of DA license was requested by Bud Nixon and 0 <br />I <br />\ Larry Sharley to permit retention of the existing license until completion of <br />\ purchase of LaMars by Mr. Nixon. Purchase is contingent upon settlement of I <br />'J law suit involving OLeC suspension of the license. Staff recommended refusal i <br />of the renewal. <br />\ <br />! <br />Mr. Wood moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to recommend disapproval of : . <br />license renewal. i <br />i <br />Councilman Williams was concerned about taking action on a matter involved in ~ <br />a judicial process, more or less making a negative decision before any deci- I <br />sion was made in the courts. Mr. Wood said his motion was not based on whether i <br />\ the applicant was guilty or not guilty, rather on the consideration that action i <br />I was requested. Councilman Murray asked for elaboration of reasons for recom- <br />! mending denial. <br /> <br />Manager explained revocation of LaMars license by the Oregon Liquor Control 411 <br />Commission was based upon a number of violations of liquor laws. That revoca- '" <br />I tion was being appealed and revocation of the license suspended until the I <br />case was settled. He noted counts for violation of municipal ordinances pending\ <br />i in municipal court and general knowledge of the type of operation at that loca- i <br />I tion over the last year or so. Manager pointed out that the flexibility of ; <br />i thE' Council's recommenda tions was such tha t if the Counci 1 fel tit was not a ; <br />, desirable operation in the community it had the right to recommend that the <br />! license not be renewed. He said a case ~ould be made for violation of State <br />raws - if it was not well operated or managed, if it might be an attraction <br />; '. fbr law violators, if it was unclean, etc. Councilman Wood referred to viola- <br />! tions listed by the OLCC 011 Mr. Nixon's operation of the former Golden Canary <br />: tavern and said that included several instances of employes' serving minors. '\ <br />i Mr. Murray said he found it difficult to evaluate a list of violations unless <br />I , <br />; there was some comparison to determine whether violations were "run of the mill" ; <br />! for taverns or were extraordinary offenses. 1 <br /> <br />: Councilman Keller felt court action would take care of the matter of its Own ! <br />accord. He was uncomfortable taking action with the law suit pending. Council- i <br />man McDonald was in favor of recommending discontinuance of the l.icense, rely- : <br />ing upon staff's recommendation. <br />I _ <br />i Councilwoman Campbell wondered when settlement of the law suit would occur."" <br />Manager answered that it was probably anticipated that if transfer of the <br />LaMars operation to Mr. Nixon did occur the suit would be dropped. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />7/8/74 - 8 <br /> <br />,~ j <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.