Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> !Councilman Hershner asked whether team sponsors contributed toward uniforms. <br /> :Judge Allen replied that originally the sponsors owned the uniforms but problems of \ <br /> ;competition for classier outfits was created leading to a central purchasing pro- \ <br />:- cedure to provide the same basic uniform for all players. Under that arrangement \ <br /> I <br /> it was calculated the sponsors provided about a third of the funding to cover 'I <br /> maintenance and replacement of uniforms. , <br /> Comm <br /> Vote was taken on the motion as stated, to allocate $23,649 to EBAA. 9/25/74 <br /> Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br /> 2.1.Willamette Communi ty Design Center - Requ'ested $3000. Recommended $1500. <br /> I "...this applicant could <br /> iManager read portions of city attorney's opinion that <br /> ! qualify , for the allocation. However, the application in its present form is not <br /> ,sufficiently specific in certain respects...." " the city is not free to simply i <br /> . . . I <br /> support or contribute to or aid a worthwhile organization.... The city can apply I <br /> l <br /> transient room tax funds to purchase of identifiable cultural services." He said <br /> .it appeared that an effort by the applicant to specifically define the services <br /> .for which the city's money would be spent would legally qualify the Design Center <br /> :for funds. He said that if the allocation was approved staff would want to work <br /> iwith applicant in defining those services to be sure they were within legal limits. <br /> .Alternative might be to refer the request back to the Allocation'Gommittee for more <br /> specific application. Manager said he thought the matter could be worked out at <br /> staff level if the Council approved the idea because the applicant had given a <br /> :pretty good idea of what the Center was proposing to do. <br />e 'Donald Micken, director of the Design Center, noted report submitted to the <br /> ,Allocation Committee with the application for funds spelling out the purpose and <br /> :background of the Center. He said they did not intend to provide architectural <br /> ibuilding service so much as a design and planning service to those persons or <br /> I , <br /> organizations not served by the architectural profession, that it was basically <br /> :oriented toward the type of public organization without funds for design services. <br /> ;The $3000 was requested to cover a year's budget - rent, utilities, miscellaneous <br /> (operation. Long-range financing, he said, was intended to come from donations <br /> [from local building organizations. <br /> I <br /> 'Councilman Williams questioned the category under which this request would fall - i <br /> I tourist oriented, recreational, cultural? If it was cultural, he wondered if the I <br /> !definition was becoming so broad as to include anything the eye beheld. Councilman I <br /> !Murray felt it could be defined as cultural in a broad sense - design could be ~!~- <br /> : defined as a ver~ imp~rt~nt part o~ the culturaL envir~nment. An entrancew~y to , ; <br /> a part or a publ~c bu~ld~ng, he sa~d, would be as pert~nent as a .sculpture ~n a park.; <br /> . I -. .~_, ~ '._ .__.ol.. .___.~ _ .__ ; <br /> -"~ .- .,- --- <br /> Councilwoman Beal wanted- to see guidelines, what the attorney had in mi-mi, before ! <br /> mpking a decision. Councilman Keller thought the request should go to social-serv';' <br /> :ices budget committee. Councilman Wood disagreed, saying this was a question of . I <br /> , <br />e ,design, not function. However, he said if the request was approved he would favor <br /> !working out details of the services to be provided at staff level. . <br /> i <br /> ; <br /> 'Councilwoman Campbell was in favor of the proposal; she thought it would fall under <br /> ithe cultural category. If staff wanted to do some additional work, bring:more facts <br /> ito convince a majority of the Council, she had no objection, but she was willing <br /> :to vote now. She said if it was decided to send the request to the social services <br /> ;budget committee, it should be submitted for revenue sharing funds. <br /> Mr. Wood moved seconded by Mr. Murray to aplrrove the recommended alloca- <br /> tion contingent upon the Manager's suggestions. <br /> ! <br /> ) Manager ,jeporteCAthat Cl2l1nc'rjd:man"M::!;i>riald called' b.efore he lefton' a trip saying he <br /> 'felt the kinds oi~allocations being made'of. Room Tax funds,-while"t1ley mi-ght comply <br /> with the letter and interpretation of the Charter amendment, did not meet the in- <br /> , tent at the time the amendment was adopted. The intent at the time'pf approval of <br /> the alll~1]9.rnent, Mr . Mc:!2onald f.el t L ,was.cJ)tgJ~J}ppor.t the negessary plannj,ng and <br /> !perh'aps operation of an auditorium/convention center, and (2) to engage in the- ~. <br /> I . <br /> 'kinds of activi ties that would bring tourists to the communi ty. (Councilman McDonald, <br /> ! Manager reported') felt that upon rejection of the auditorium/cenvention center <br /> 'measure there had been a switch to using the Room Tax funds for kinds of recreational <br />. and cultural activities other than the intent of the citizens when they voted for <br /> the tax. .'j- <br /> Mayor Anderson was heartily in favor of the concept of the Design Center and sensed <br /> Council favor also. He was inclined to support a motion that would approve the J <br /> concept and allow the staff to come back with a presentation of services the C~nter , <br /> I <br /> intended to provide. Councilman Wood said that w~s the intent of his motion, and <br /> he was assuming staff would make that recommendation prior to formal action at th~ <br /> October 7 Council meeting. If there was delay because of research, then he assumed <br /> ,th~t;~he_ delal)-.!'!-C?~ld be the ~~-Eue ?:,~_.t.hat..J;Q!m..~_L_llI.~~i:n,~/----- - <br /> 3~~ 10/7/74 - 5 <br />