|
<br />,
<br />
<br />. In response to Councilman Keller, Assistant Manager said ordinances were adopted in
<br />., Cottage Grove to permi t gambling in fraternal organizations only. He added that the
<br />~city managet in Springfield had reported no pressure to go beyond that level either. ;
<br />
<br />-. \ Councilman McDonald asked if permi tting social games in fraternal and religious Organiza-.!
<br />. !tions would allow the organization to receive a certain amount of money for their bene- j
<br />~fit~ Mr. Long answered that that was specifically prohibited by State law.
<br />
<br />John Langan, pit Stop Tavern, said he would like to see the ordinances adopted. He felt
<br />regulations'therein y,rere appropriate for all those interested, including taverns,
<br />restaurants, fraternal and religious organizations. . He noted that social gambling , ...... .~
<br />was permitted in Junction City, Creswell, Cottage Grove, and Springfield so he felt
<br />it should be allowed in Eugene. He thought the apparent disinterest was the result of
<br />the issue's having "drug on" for so long. He suggested a $2.00 limit so that no big
<br />: games would be involved and said as long as no gambling was permitted it would continue I
<br />iin residential areas instead of in public places.
<br />!
<br />i ,
<br />! Vote was taken on the motion to obtain. information from the city of Portland ;
<br />, with regard to its experience with legalized gambling. Motion carried, all i
<br />; . CounciJ..members present voting aye, exceptCounci.lman Hershner voting no.
<br />~. ,
<br />
<br />L.:Resolution, City Testimony Before 1975 Oregon State Legislature - Copies of proposed
<br />. amendment to resolution authorizing testimony before the State Legislature on behalf
<br />of the ci ty were previously distributed to Council members. The amendment., prepared
<br />/ by Councilman Williams, would authorize the City Manager or his designee to speak on,
<br />_ : issues before the Legislature when time pressures did not permit prior Council approval.
<br />Also, that summaries of such testimony would be provided to the Council for review
<br />and comment. Councilman Williams explained that the designee most likely would be a
<br />legislative aide in the Manager's office or possibly the Assistant Manager. He felt
<br />the amendment was warranted, especially at the end of the legislative session when i
<br />lissues were sometimes brought to the floor in a hurry and immediate action on behalf
<br />L~f the ci ty might be' necessary. .. . .. _'. .._
<br />---....- --......,.... -....__..., - __ ~ '~"_';~_'~ _. .__~ .". - . . ,_._. _.' .. ~" "- _.."<'0' .. .~'.
<br />
<br />,Mayor Anderson asked if a designee could include a Council member. Mr. Williams ~
<br />, . . . ... \
<br />I answered that anyone preferred by the Manager and des~gnated by h~m would be covered \
<br />iunder the terms of the resolution. Councilwoman Beal. added that Section 2 ,under the \
<br />,[.original resolution made provision for an individual Council member to stat'!.d-tY posi- \
<br />:tion if it was made clear it was not stated on behalf of the entire COUnCYff~'- \
<br />i \ Comm
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. HershI'ler to adopt the amendment. 10(23/74
<br />: Motion carried unanimously. Approve
<br />
<br />j .... ... .. d h \
<br />M. Downtown Development p~str~ct, Property Tax Levy 1974-75 - Manager reporte t at I
<br />ordinances would be presented at the October 29th Council meeting which would levy the t.
<br />. property tax approved at the June 18, 1974 election :for support of 50% of the Dis- i
<br />e trict's budget ($113,000). I
<br />I : Comm
<br />. I
<br />I Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to approve the ordinances. 10(23/74
<br />I Motion carried unanimously. Approve
<br />I
<br />N. jpetition, Storm sewer on Hilyard between 35th and 36th - Petitioned by owners of 100% '
<br />!of property to.be assessed. i
<br />I Comm
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to accept the petition. 1~/23/74
<br />Motion carried unanimously. . ~pprove
<br />i
<br />O. IAppeal, Zoning Board of Appeals conditional approval. of six-foot high wooden fence at !
<br />\2605 Friendly Street, V. W. Blowers i
<br />iCopies of appeal letter from Mr. Blowers together with copies of Zoning Board of Ap- I
<br />ipeals minutes (September 26, 1974) were previously distributed to Council members. .1
<br />iMr. Blowers was not satisfied with conditions attached to' approval of the fence con- !
<br />!structed on the property line along the 26th Avenue side of his property ~ that the ;
<br />iportion of the fence east of an existing concrete slab be set back not less than :
<br />Iseven feet from the property line, and that the outside of the fence be covered wi th !
<br />!Plant materi.als to partially obscure it. Staff recommended public hearing on Novem-I .
<br />ber 12 and tour to view the property prior to that time. .: Comm
<br />I
<br />~ I 10/23/74
<br />W' i Mrs. Bea1 moved seconded by Mr. Williams to set public hearing on the Approve
<br />I appeal for November 12 Council meeting. 'Motion carried unanimously. I
<br />
<br />p.IAPpeal, Planning Commission October 8th denial of request to rezone property on I
<br />I , I
<br />.\Grant Street between 17th and 18th - From R-l to C-l (Hedin, et al) :
<br />\ f ~~
<br />\ Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to set public hearing on i 210/23/74
<br />the appeal at the November 25 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimoUSly.: App~ove
<br />I
<br />)
<br />~_._~.. - -", _.-~-----_.-"- - ~,- -- -.-- _.'~ --- -.--.---,-.-:-,.--' -:."-"~'-'~'---~-----"-'-'_._- --_._- -- -----, .- .-....._.--....--_.~.....-_.__.--------------,-'--,
<br />
<br />
<br />'3o~ 10/29/74 - 11
<br />
|