Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- .. Corom <br />In response to Council President Williams, Mr. Hunt said the Agency desi.red no Council 11/6/74 <br />action as this time. However, they would be looking in the future to building over the File <br />sidewalk area and also to building a bridge over 8th Avenue connecting the two structu~es. <br />Councilman Williams said it could be assumed t~e Council supported the desig~ as pre~~: ~ <br />sented and encouraged the Agency to proceed "w~th all duehast:e." _ ~ ., <br /> <br />Q. Community Development TqskForce - Representatives appointed from Neighborhood Added <br />Organizations - Gary Spivak (Whiteaker) and George McGuinness (Laurelhili); since <br />Planning Commission - Susan Franklin and James Bernhard; Lane County Housing Comm <br />Authority - Emily Schue; and Joint Housing Committee - Betty Niven. ' File <br /> <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Murray to approve, affirm, and file as <br />noted Items B through D, Items F and G, and Items I through Q; that Item A <br />be returned to committee-of~the~whole; that Item E be referred back to staff; <br />and that Item H be discussed under the ordinance section. Motion carried <br />unanimously. . ' <br /> <br /> <br />III - Ordinances (0700) <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 663 - Amending Section 8.700(e) of the City Code re: Maximum surface <br />area of billboards, read the first time on October 29, 1974 <br />and held, lacking unanimous consent for second reading, was brought back and read the <br />second :ime by c~uncil bill.number and title,.there being no council member present ~ <br />requestlng that lt be read ln full.... <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Murray that the bill be approved and given final pass- <br />age. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, Council members McDonald, Murray, and Wood voting <br />aye; Councilwomen Beal and Campbell voting no; Concilman Williams abstaining; and the bill <br />was declared passed and numbered 17197. <br />(0720) <br />Council Bill No. 670 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer in area between a line <br />400 feet north of 1-105 and a line 850 feet south of Centennial <br />Boulevard (extended) from east line of 1st Addition to Ayres Subdivision to 1200 feet <br />west of Fairway Loop (extended) (73-06), read the first time on October 29, 1974 and <br />c:.'referred to Assessment Panel for hearing on November 4, 1974, was brought back for <br />consideration of Panel recommendations and read the second t~me by council bill number <br />and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Murray that the bill be approved and <br />given. final passage. <br /> <br />Don Allen, public works; director, reiterated the staff's position for recommending assess- <br />ment of the levy as proposed. He said data given the public works department by Pape' <br />was used to establish the elevation of the connection and the lateral was designed to ~ <br />permit connection of the private allowing twice the minimum.'f1ow required. ,. <br /> <br />Don Furtick, 1705 Fairmount Boulevard, objected to paying for lateral cost assessed against (0761) <br />property at the northwest corner of Centennial Boulevard and Centennial Loop in which he <br />had an interest. It was his understanding that the people from whom he had bought the <br />property had refused to participate in the cost of the sewer installed to serve the McKay <br />subdivison. That line could also be used by the Furtick property. He contended that the <br />,line was installed at the private developer's cost, that its cost had been paid for quite <br />some time, and that there was no reason at this time for the cost to be charged to him. <br />If it was charged to his property, he said, the same criteria should be used in assessing <br />the cost to all the other abutting properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Allen displayed a sketch showing the sewer lines constructed by the city and the private (0809) <br />line installed by McKay to city specifications. He explained the assessment proposed <br />and said the private line was constructed so that any property annexing later could use <br />that system. There was agreement at that time that no future assessment would be waived <br />for any property within 160 feet of the line. The Furtick property, he said, gained con- <br />nection and the city had no choice but to assess accordingly. In response to Manager, <br />Mr. Allen said the Furtick property had never been assessed for sewer service and probably <br />never would be unless for this particular project. <br /> <br />In response to Mrs. Beal, Mr. Allen explained the McKay ownership on Centennial and said (O~ <br />that in staff's opinion there were no double assessments involved. . - <br /> <br />In resonse to Councilman McDonald, Mr. Allen pointed out on the sketch where the Furtick (0884) <br />property was connected to the sewer line and explained the charges on the cost of a private <br />line versus the lateral. <br /> <br />Rollcall vote ,was taken on the motion to approve and pa?s the bill. Motion <br />carried, all council members present voting aye, and the bill was declared <br />passed and numbered 17198. <br />:3~~ 11/12/74 - 18 <br />