My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/23/1974 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1974
>
12/23/1974 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 9:04:36 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:17:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/23/1974
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> MINUTES <br />(- EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br /> December 23, 1974 <br /> : - /Adjourn~d meeting of the Common Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon - adj ourned from the <br /> meet_tn:g:held December 9, 1974 - was called to order by Mayor Lester E. Anderson at 7:30 p.m. <br /> on.December 23, 1974, in the Council Chamber with the following Council members present: <br /> H. C. McDonald, Wickes Beal, Beth Campbell, Neil Murray and Robert Wood. Absent were <br /> Councilmen Tom Williams, James Hershner and Gus Keller. <br /> I - Public Hearings <br /> A. Vacating Overhead Public Utility Easement 9n McLean Boulevard near Douglas Drive and <br /> Lindsay Loop (Griswold) i <br /> . Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> Council Bill No. 693 - Vacating overhead public utility easement on McLean <br /> Boulevard near Douglas Drive ~nd Lindsay Loop was <br /> read by council bill number and title only, there being no council member <br /> present requesting that it be read in full. <br />- Mrs. Cam~bell moved seconded by Mrs. Byal that the bill be read the seaong time <br /> by councll bill number only, wlth unanlmous consent of the Councll, an t at <br /> enactment be considered' at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was <br /> read the second :time by council bifl number only. <br /> Mrs. Campbe 11 moved .s econded. by Mr'. Mur:r;:ay that thebi 11 . b'e approved a~d given final <br /> passage. Rollcall vote. All council members present votlng aye, the blll was <br /> declared passed and numbered 17219. <br /> B. Appeal, Denial of used merchandi,se dealer's license - George Stathakis for George's <br /> Garage, 341 Van Buren Street <br /> It was explained that the appellant was to be out of town for the Council meeting <br /> and had requested putting the hearing over to a January meeting. The reason for the <br /> denial of the license was that Mr. Stathakis has failed to comply with, the City's <br /> sign code in that he had failed to make the necessary application for permits for <br /> sign installation. He had previously received verbal permission over the phone for <br /> the size of the sign and thought that, was all that was required. <br /> Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to postpone the decision on the <br /> appeal 'until January 27. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> C. Liquor License, Barney Bagel & Suzy Creamcheese, 757 Willamette (R) - New <br /> This outlet is located in the Smeed Hotel. A normal investigation has been conducted <br />- with one objector, 15 non-objectors and one "no answer". <br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to recommend approval. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> D. Rezoning to RP-SR property at northeast corner 40th and Donald (Sletten) <br /> This matter was brought back for action/only, with no public hearing to be held. <br /> The rezoning was recommended by the Planning Commission and came to the Council on <br /> November 12. The Council failed to adopt and the matter was referred to a joint <br /> meeting on Decemper 11 at which time the Planning Commission failed to affirm its <br /> recommendation, by a 3 to 3 vote. A request has been received from Mr. Sletten to <br /> reopen the matter to the extent of - -showing some slides. The slides had not previously <br /> been shown at a Council meeting. The ,City Attorney felt that as part of the rebuttal <br /> it would be a~propriate to have the slides shown because the record shows that all <br /> material was transmitted to the' council and the slides were part of that record. <br /> This would indicate, then, that the November 12 testimony was not complete. The <br /> showing "of slides would simply complete the record and a full~scale hearing would not <br /> be necessary. <br /> Mr. Saul of the Planning Department showed various slides of the area in qhestion. <br />'. Donald B. Driscoll showed slides on behalf of the applicant. The record should show <br /> now.that the Council has received all written notices, minutes of Planning Commission <br /> meetings with the exception of the minutes of the last joint meeting, maps, staff notes <br /> and slides. All are part of the record of the Council. <br /> Mayor Anderson indicated that only those council nlembers could vote who attended the <br /> November 12 meeting and the December 11 joint meeting. Those not having attended would <br /> have had to listen to tapes of the proceedings. Mrs. Beal stated that, although she <br /> 12/23/74 - 1 <br /> 4-20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.