My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/08/1986 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1986
>
01/08/1986 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:22:34 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:17:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/8/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />J' <br /> <br />M I NUT E S <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Work Session <br />City Council Chamber <br /> <br />January 8, 1986 <br />11:30 a.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Cynthia Wooten, Richard Hansen, Emily Schue, Freeman <br />Holmer, Ruth Bascom, Debra Ehrman, Roger Rutan, Jeff <br />Mi 11 ere <br /> <br />Mayor Obie called the work session to order. <br /> <br />I. METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN MID-PERIOD REVIEW <br /> <br />Planning Director Susan Brody said the purpose of the work session was to give <br />councilors an opportunity to review some controversial issues in the Mid- <br />Period Review of the Metro Plan. The council was scheduled to tentatively <br />take action on the changes recommended in the Mid-Period Review during its <br />regular noon session. The changes would be incorporated into an ordinance <br />which would be presented to the council later. If the tentative approval <br />indicates discrepancies with the approvals of the other elected bodies, the <br />MPC will be asked to review the issues. <br /> <br />Teresa Bishow of the Planning Department discussed some of the issues in the <br />background material sent to the council. <br /> <br />A. Metro Plan Text Amendments <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow discussed the procedure for identifying and protecting natural <br />resources presented in a new Policy #36 recommended by the staff for the <br />Environmental Resources Element of the Metro Plan. The suggested policy <br />responded to concerns expressed by the Department of Land Conservation and <br />Development (DLCD). <br /> <br />Answering questions from councilors, Ms. Brody said the policy includes <br />reasons for elongating the process if it is necessary. She said the policy <br />does not define what a "significant" natural resource is. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said the policy should indicate that jurisdictions should rely 011 <br />experts, such as those in the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, to <br />assist in the determination of the significance of a natural resource. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan said a reference to the DLCO definition of "significant" could be <br />inserted in the policy. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />January 8, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.