Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Bishow said the staff did not know a complete goals analysis would be <br />necessary to include only 40 acres in the urban growth boundary when it <br />recommended approval of the proposal. It would be difficult to justify the <br />addition. She said the applicant is aware of the problems. Ms. Brody said <br />the council would have to direct the staff to augment the findings if the <br />proposal is approved. The LCDC could appeal the decision of the local <br />jurisdictions to the Lane Use Board of Appeals. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen said the MPC recommended approval of the proposal. He thought the <br />proposal should be approved because the local jurisdictions recommended it. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie adjourned the work session at 12:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br />::t:~ <br /> <br />Ci ty Manager <br />(Recorded by Betty Lou Rarick) <br /> <br />1936C <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />Ja nuary 8, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />