01/22/1986 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e She said a memo dated January 16, 1986, from Timothy Sercombe, the City Attorney, was distributed to the councilors. The memo indicated the OCLO's statement is correct. Ms. Bishow said the information in the memo attached to the council.s agenda indicates a need for additional low-density residential land within the urban growth boundary cannot be demonstrated now. Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to approve the staff recommendation to deny Amendment B-20 of the Metro Plan Mid-Period Review. Mr. Hansen said he did not like to deny the amendment because of pressure from the state. He said the proposal had received support earlier. and a 40-acre addition to the urban growth boundary seems insignificant. He would oppose the motion. e Ms. Bascom said the staff recommendation was different from the one received earlier, but the additional information indicated the increase in the urban growth boundary is not needed. Mr. Miller said he will support the motion. He said there is a surplus of residential land in the city and approval of the proposal could provide a precedent for other additions to the urban growth boundary which would create problems for the school systems. Ms. Ehrman said the proposal had generated a stricter definition from the DLCO about additions to the urban growth boundary which will be useful in the future. Roll call vote; the motion carried 7:1 with Ms. Wooten, Ms. Schue, Mr. Holmer, Ms. Bascom, Ms. Ehrman, Mr. Rutan, and Mr. Miller voting aye and Mr. Hansen voting nay. Mayor Obie adjourned the meeting at 1:05 p.m. R7~ Mi cheal Gl eason City Manager (Recorded by Betty Lou Rarick) BLR:ky/1952C e MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 22, 1986 Page ,~