My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/19/1986 Meeting (2)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1986
>
02/19/1986 Meeting (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:57:00 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/19/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />F. The study area for the tax increment district [shall] may <br />include the Central Eugene Project area, and other <br />additional areas the Study Committee finds appropriate under <br />ORS 457.010(1). <br /> <br />The amendment was accepted by the maker and the seconder of the <br />motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said the original wording seemed appropriate, but Mayor Obie said <br />the change did not seem to be substantive. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie adjourned the meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency and <br />reconvened the meeting of the Eugene City Council. <br /> <br />VI. METROPOLITAN PLAN DIAGRAM AMENDMENT 8-15, NORTH GATEWAY COMMERCIAL <br />(memo, map, background information distributed) <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Teresa 8ishow of the <br />Planning Department gave the staff report. She said the Metro Plan Diagram <br />Amendment 8-15 (Cockerline property) is a request to change 7.6 acres in the <br />North Gateway Special Light Industrial Site to a commercial designation. <br />She said the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) decided to let each juris- <br />diction take action on the amendment request and the Springfield City Council <br />tentatively denied the request. The Lane County Board of Commissioners has <br />taken no action on the request. <br /> <br />Answering questions from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Bishow said the pUblic hearing on the <br />proposed amendment was closed on December 3, 1986; consequently, the applicant <br />has not submitted additional material. She said the Springfield City Council <br />vote was 3:2. She said the original request was for 28 acres. It was then <br />reduced to 4.6 acres when a trucking firm indicated it would locate on the <br />property. The applicant later increased the area to 7.6 acres. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue said she will vote to deny the request. She spoke with a <br />Springfield councilor who voted to deny the request. She said requests for <br />changes for less than five acres can be submitted as zone change requests, and <br />the Springfield city councilors will consider a zone change for the Cockerline <br />property. She said a zone change would give the City of Springfield more <br />control over development which should be planned to accommodate the part of <br />the Special Light Industrial Site which is in the flood plain. She added that <br />a plan amendment would require justification of the need for additional <br />commercial property. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 19, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.