My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/25/1986 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1986
>
02/25/1986 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:02:50 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:18:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/25/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />E. Business Assistance Team <br /> <br />Mr. Whitlow said that there are six and one-half staff on the BATeam. Answer- <br />ing Ms. Wooten's question, Mr. Gleason said that the original BATe am staff was <br />composed of people already in the organization and that their original jobs <br />were not filled. Ms. Ehrman asked what the cut of $150,000 represented, and <br />Mr. Whitlow said that the BATeam would not be able to service as many clients, <br />that special projects would be eliminated, and that other services would be <br />reduced. The Metro Partnership is a contractual agreement that is renewed <br />annually. Mr. Miller asked if the Chamber of Commerce could pick up any of <br />the services. Mr. Gleason pointed out that it is the perception of the Metro <br />Partnership and the Chamber of Commerce that the City is not doing enough <br />now. Some projects would be at risk, such as the newly opened Customs Sta- <br />tion. The Metro Partnership does not do business assistance, only recruit- <br />ment. Ms. Wooten reported that she and Mr. Rutan have prepared a memorandum <br />proposing to reshape the Council Committee on Economic Development and to work <br />with the BATeam to become more proactive. <br /> <br />F. Metropolitan Partnership <br /> <br />Mr. Whitlow explained that the reduction was in the actual contract to help <br />support operations; the staff is above and beyond. <br /> <br />G. Neighborhood Program <br /> <br />The reduction, according to Mr. Whitlow, would eliminate the program, one <br />staff position, and materials. Referrals will then need to be made by <br />separate departments. <br /> <br />H. Municipal Court <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman suggested that the traffic crimes, which are under State statute, <br />be handled by the District Court. She also questioned why the City pays $45 <br />per hour on their Public Defender Contract, while the State pays $30 per <br />hour. Mr. Holmer agreed that both were worth exploring. <br /> <br />I. Convention and Visitors Bureau <br /> <br />Under this category, Mr. Rutan introduced Destination-Point Activities for <br />reduction consideration. This area, which includes Cultural Arts, the Eugene <br />Celebration, and the Destination-Point Program, is staffed by three full-time <br />employees and costs about $200,000, according to Mr. Whitlow. Ms. Wooten <br />asked how the DFI was started and its relationship to the Visitors and Conven- <br />tion Bureau. Mr. Gleason said that two Parks staff were assigned to the pro- <br />gram and one added later for the Eugene Celebration. The original money came <br />from the Visitors and Convention Bureau. None of the three positions are new <br />positions, but came from other program areas. In response to Mr. Miller's <br />question, Mr. Gleason continued to explain that there is no duplication of <br />activities of the Visitors and Convention Bureau and the OPA. The Visitors <br />and Convention Bureau has revised its mission statement and has nothing to do <br />the the Eugene Celebration. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />February 25, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.