Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />He said the timeline had been developed after meetings between City and State <br />staffs, and a supplemental environmental report was scheduled to be issued in <br />mid- to late April. Mr. McKinley said a public information session, similar <br />to the one last fall, would be conducted after the report was issued. A City <br />Council hearing would be held in early June, he said, with State staff making <br />a presentation on results of the report. In July, the Oregon Department of <br />Transportation would issue a hearing study report, which Mr. McKinley <br />explained would include a recommended alignment for the entire project. <br />He said the City Council in late July would be asked to call for a November 4 <br />election. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Weishar described the routes under consideration. He said some minor <br />adjustments had been made to alternate #1 at grade, and he reviewed the costs, <br />advantages, and disadvantages in the summary. He noted that two at-grade <br />railroad crossings currently served about one train per day, and while the <br />other crossing was not now in use, Goodwill had expressed some interest in <br />possible future use. <br /> <br />Mr. Weishar said alternate #1 elevated would require an extra lane to allow <br />trucks to accelerate up the ramp, so the westbound roadway would be elevated <br />above southbound Highway 99, beginning east of Pay IN' Pak. Mr. McKinley <br />added that the Citizen Advisory Committee had suggested lessening right-of-way <br />impacts by installing concrete walls, but costs for the ROWand for the wall <br />would be about equal. Mr. Weishar reviewed the advantages, disadvantages, and <br />costs in the summary, adding that local access would occur at 5th Avenue. <br />Responding to Ms. Bascom's question, staff said the Willamette Company still <br />would be affected. <br /> <br />Mr. Weishar reviewed alternate lA at grade. He said proximity of the two <br />intersections would mean cutting off access to 5th Avenue from Highway 99, so <br />Wilson Street would be extended to provide an entrance to 5th Avenue. <br />Mr. McKinley said the Citizen Advisory Committee had suggested moving the <br />access entrance, but intersections then would be too close together and would <br />pose safety problems. Mr. Weishar reviewed the advantages and disadvantages <br />of alternate lA at grade. Mr. McKinley noted an additional advantage of the <br />route was that it would provide a convenient connector for eastbound traffic <br />turning north onto Highway 99, while all other alternatives would require <br />traffic to travel to Garfield before turning north. He added that the <br />connector route was considered to have low demand. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen asked why it was necessary to cut off 5th Avenue access. <br />Mr. Weishar said the angle was not a safe one for intersections and Conger <br />Street would be quite close to the intersection. Mr. Hansen asked whether the <br />angle could be changed. Mr. Weishar said avoiding businesses to the north <br />presented a limitation, and he added that curves would be made more difficult <br />to negotiate. Mr. Obie asked how access would be provided to the area beyond <br />the cul-de-sac. Mr. Weishar said a Tyinn Street extension would be built. <br />Mr. Weishar also said the State was considering leaving open the intersection <br />at 5th and Seneca on all alternatives, instead of installing a cul-de-sac, but <br />he added that no left turns out would be permitted. He said alternate lA at <br />grade had not been included in the EIS before. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--City Council Dinner/Work Session <br /> <br />March 13, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />