My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/17/1986 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1986
>
03/17/1986 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:19:48 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:18:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/17/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The Pedestrian Auto district provisions, according to Mr. Croteau, would allow <br />unlimited use of flags, banners. and other attention-getting devices, <br />including searchlights in the downtown district. Ms. Ehrman asked if there <br />were restrictions on how long these devices could be displayed, and <br />Mr. Croteau said no. These would also be allowed on 13th Avenue. <br />Restrictions could be added to the provisions. Ms. Wooten questioned why <br />searchlights would be allowed on the mall and who initiated the change. <br />Mr. Croteau said that the Downtown Commission endorsed the provisions. <br />Mr. Hansen questioned why the downtown area could use searchlights, but not <br />Outlying Commercial districts. Mr. Obie asked what the boundaries are of the <br />Pedestrian Auto Sign district: Mr. Croteau identified 13th Avenue north to <br />5th, east to High, and west to Charnelton. He also said that all other <br />existing regulations stay the same. <br /> <br />5. Provision of Outdoor Merchandising <br /> <br />The Planning Commission recommends that there be a reference in the Sign Code <br />that outdoor merchandising is regulated in the zoning ordinances. In response <br />to Ms. Wooten's question. Mr. Croteau said that the ordinance applies to <br />permanent, not temporary, displays. <br /> <br />6. Signing for Businesses Adjacent to Interstate or Limited Access <br />Highways <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau cited Delta Village as an example. The provision would allow an <br />identity sign on the Beltline and Delta Highway frontage. Ms. Wooten recalled <br />that the City Council disapproved this sign at a past meeting, and Mr. Obie <br />clarified that the City Council was prohibited from allowing a Sign Code <br />variance. Mr. Croteau also clarified that this would be a wall-mounted sign. <br />Mr. Miller asked about highway identity signs for businesses, and Mr. Croteau <br />said that these were very restricted. <br /> <br />7. Bus Stop Waiting Area Advertisement <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau said that this kind of sign is limited to the upright area of the <br />bench on the inside back of the bench and that it must be in an approved <br />location and endorsed by the LTD. The idea was initiated by a citizen and <br />supported by LTD. <br /> <br />8. Allowance of Banners for Community Events <br /> <br />These are already allowed; the new provisions increase the allowable size from <br />100 to 200 square feet and allow sponsor identification on 25 percent of the <br />banner area. They can be posted from 21 to 30 days prior to an event. Both <br />Mr. Miller and Ms. Wooten questioned why 30 days was needed for prior <br />advertising. Mr. Hansen questioned the definition of banner, and Mr. Croteau <br />said that it would be fabric or flexible material. Mr. Rutan asked if any <br />other provisions for banners had been changed, and Mr. Croteau said only in a <br />Pedestrian Auto district. <br /> <br />EXCERPT MINUTES--City Council Work Session <br /> <br />March 17, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.