My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/19/1986 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1986
>
03/19/1986 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:19:59 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:18:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/19/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />property solar systems. He said the proposed reV1Slons indicate that new <br />buildings and additions in existing low-density developments should not shade <br />south-facing walls on other properties any more than an 8-foot fence on the <br />north property line would shade them (south wall standard). If the 8-foot <br />fence standard will not permit a building or addition, the proposed revisions <br />indicate that the new building or addition should not shade the roof of build- <br />ings on other properties more than a 16-foot fence located on the north <br />property line would shade them (south roof standard). If the south wall and <br />south roof standards cannot be met, the revisions guarantee that homes in low- <br />density zoning districts can be built to a height of 24 feet. <br /> <br />Answering a question from Councilor Hansen, Mr. Chenkin said the proposed <br />revisions do not take additional rights away from property owners. The revi- <br />sions add a setback similar to the setbacks in the zoning ordinance. He said <br />the proposed revisions balance the rights of property owners to develop their <br />property and the rights of other property owners to invest in the use of solar <br />energy. <br /> <br />Replying to questions from Councilor Holmer, Mr. Chenkin said the ordinance <br />does not include statements about neighbors negotiating about solar access, <br />but the ordinance does not prohibit that kind of negotiations. The standards <br />will be detailed in the code. <br /> <br />Mr. Chenkin said the standards for new developments indicate that lots should <br />be designed, if possible, with a north-south dimension that will permit houses <br />to be placed so they will not shade houses to the north. The regulations will <br />permit developers to use either prescriptive and performance methods of demon- <br />strating compliance to the solar access provisions for a minimum of 80 percent <br />of the lots. He reviewed the exceptions to the standards. He emphasized that <br />PUD and subdivision developers will be guaranteed the density in the zoning <br />ordinance if the solar access standards cannot be met without reducing the <br />density. <br /> <br />Mr. Chenkin said the solar access guarantee indicates that new vegetation that <br />will shade an adjoining lot cannot be planted after a solar access guarantee <br />has been granted. He reviewed the process for obtaining a solar access guar- <br />antee for specific lots. He said the solar access guarantee limits vegetation <br />only on the part of a lot on which the vegetation would shade another lot. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen asked Mr. Chenkin to investigate the possibility of protecting <br />people from the sight of solar systems on neighbors' roofs if the people have <br />been prohibited from planting trees. <br /> <br /> <br />(Recorded by Betty Lou Rarick) <br />BLR:ch/2004C <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />March 19, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.