04/16/1986 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- e e Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 8:0. Ms. Wooten said she appreciated Mr. Hansen's request at a Budget Committee meeting for more detail about supplemental budgets. Mr. Holmer suggested the information be printed in elite type. Council Bill 2879 was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors present voting aye, the bill was declared passed (and became Ordinance No. 19381). III. DRAFT EUGENE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) FY86/87 THROUGH FY95/96 (memo distributed) City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the discussion of the draft Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Kirk McKinley of the Planning Department gave the staff report. He said the CIP is a framework for planning capital improve- ments and the first year will be considered by the Budget Committee when it is approved by the council. A. Response to Council Questions Mr. McKinley said questions about the CIP which councilors asked at the public hearing on March 17, 1986, were in a memo dated April 8, 1986, entitled "Response to Questions on the Draft Capital Improvement Program" and attached to the council's agenda. He reviewed each of the questions. 1. Why does the CIP indicate a cost of $1.1 million and the TransPlan indicate a cost of $330,000 for the Roosevelt, Highway 99 to Maple project? Mr. McKinley said the TransPlan estimate includes only the cost of the roadway between Highway 99 and Maple. The CIP estimate includes costs for right-of-way acquisition and construction between Highway 99 to Maple Street and the cost of an off-street bike path from Highway 99 to Beltline Road. Mr. Miller said the intersection of Roosevelt and Seneca Road will be extremely dangerous after the construction. He asked if the cost of traffic signals at Roosevelt and Seneca Road is included in the estimate. Later in the meeting, Mr. Teitzel said signals are included in the project. 2. Is it possible to move Bethel Drive improvements up in the CIP scheduling? Mr. McKinley said most of the east side of Bethel Drive is outside the city limits; therefore, the City cannot assess road improvements to the owner. Also, Systems Development funds are not adequate for the improvement in the first three years of the CIP. MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 16, 1986 Page 4