Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />so if the criteria were not met, staff would have to be directed to make nega- <br />tive findings. Mr. Rutan said that quality decisions were important, and cri- <br />teria sometimes were limiting as to considerations that could come into play. <br />Mr. Sercombe read the criteria in Section 9.150 of the code which requires <br />that the property be inside the urban growth boundary, that annexation be <br />consistent with adopted plans and policies, that public services and facili- <br />ties can be provided as prescribed in the Metro Plan, and that annexation will <br />result in a logical service delivery boundary. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer said he would oppose the motion because he thought an adequate road <br />plan was needed before proceeding. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said she would support the motion because her concerns about the <br />road plan had been allayed by the Planning Commission's separate motion and <br />unanimous support. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion carried 6:2, with Councilors Hansen, <br />Schue, Bascom, Ehrman, Miller, and Rutan voting aye; Councilors <br />Wooten and Holmer voting nay. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie noted that he owned a long-term lease for KUGN towers on the adja- <br />cent property, but said he did not think this council action constituted a <br />conflict of interest. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Final Order No. A/Z 86-2--A final order rezoning property <br />located north of Sarah Lane, east of <br />Gilham Road in the north Willakenzie <br />area, from County AGT/U Agriculture, <br />Grazing, Timber-Raising District with <br />an Interim Urbanizing Combining Dis- <br />trict Overlay to City RA Suburban <br />Residential District. <br /> <br />Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, to approve Final Order <br />No. A/Z 86-2 concerning property located north of Sarah Lane, <br />east of Gilham Road in the north Willakenzie area. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman said a previous annexation had included a requirement for access to <br />the property. Mr. Croteau said he thought that case had concerned property <br />which had no direct access to a public right-of-way, whereas this lot has <br />access to an improved public right-of-way. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion carried 7:1, with Councilors Hansen, <br />Schue, Holmer, Bascom, Erhman, Miller, and Rutan voting aye; <br />Councilor Wooten voting nay. <br /> <br />B. Riverfront Park Supplemental Findings (memo, background information <br />distributed) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the item. Pat Decker of the Planning <br />Department presented the staff report. She said the subject of tonight's <br />hearing was the Riverfront Study and the plan amendment designating a portion <br />of University-owned property north of Franklin Boulevard for University <br />research. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 28, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />