06/09/1986 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e e e Mr. Hansen asked where the pressure points would be if the Valley River Bridge were not built. Mr. Reinhard replied that Washington-Jefferson Bridge, the Delta Loop, and Valley River Interchange would be the focus of an alternative package which would include adding a lane each way on the Washington-Jefferson Bridge, a new ramp, and major improvements to the interchange. The total package would probably exceed $10 million and add stress to 6th and 7th avenues. The Valley River Bridge would move traffic to the Chambers Connector. Ms. Bascom commented that the Transp1an is clear about the need for the Valley River Bridge and that the need for right-of-way acquisition early in the process was clear as well. Mr. Obie commented that the Valley River Bridge would principally serve River Road, Valley River, and Goodpasture Island, and also access southwest Eugene. 2. Refinement Studies Mr. Reinhard defined the purpose of this portion of Transplan implementation, as provision for transportation planning refinements to the Transplan. The needs for refinement studies are in four areas: Central Area Transportation study (CATS); North Willakenzie; Willow Creek; and Riverfront. Mr. Obie asked about the Harlow Road overpass and interchange. Mr. Reinhard replied that the Transplan calls it an overpass and calls for improvements for the safety of pedestrians and bicycles. Mr. Miller asked if money is currently budgeted for the Refinement Studies; Mr. Reinhard explained that they would done on the work plan within the normal staff time and operating budget. In response to Ms. Wooten, Mr. Reinhard said that citizen involvement processes would be approved by the Citizen Involvement Committee. Mr. Holmer asked if the Central Area Transportation Study process included contact with users outside of the West University Neighborhood. Mr. Reinhard replied that the contact would be through public hearings and other organizations where they exist. Ms. Ehrman asked when the Wi11amette project between 11th and 19th would be completed; Mr. Reinhard replied that it was scheduled for completion before the Eugene Celebration. Ms. Wooten asked when the final decision would be made regarding the treatment of 12th and Wil1amette and was told that several alternatives are being reviewed, but no decision had been made. 3. Eugene Planned Street and Highway Right-of-Way Plan Mr. Teitzel reviewed the information. Mr. Miller had several questions regarding West 11th and major and minor collectors. Mr. Gleason said that Mr. Miller would be provided with the information he requested. 4. Street Standards Mr. Teitzel continued with a review of street standard specifications. Mr. Hansen asked what the typical width in older areas built in the 1940's and 1950's was in comparison with proposed widths. Mr. Teitze1 replied that many streets were 26 to 27 feet wide. Mr. Gleason pointed out that the MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 9, 1986 Page 4