Item C: Metro Pln Amend.Pub Sft - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Van Vactor responded that it was the overall context of Policy 15 that lists: "Will be considered only when and states sections a to e. He thought that was restrictive, as they had to meet all of the conditions. Jim Gangle, Assessor, explained if the district chooses a particular rat~ h~ aaia th~ would be a County. (Copy in file). He noted that compression would ~ on thc l~al option l~ies first. He noted the City of Eugene has a youth and library 1°~ ~i~9n has the police and fire local option levies and those di~s st~ ~mP~esSing compression moves into the permanent authority. Bettman asked if Lane County would continue to spend what ~ ~ spen~ng now., She also asked if the level they would continue to fund public safet~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ounty s general fund would include $20 million. She asked if this would be $~0 milll~ ~ ~erVices. Gangle indicated it would be $20 million of servie~ ~ ~ ~ed back. Gangle said they want balance to ~ ~d they are ask~g to maintain balance across the whole public safety system. He said th~ ~ ~; work in C°n~ ~ ~ ~i~ies. He said they are not trying to work alone. Ballew asked if the would have any effect. Gangl~ r~~ i~e real mark~ ~ increasing faster than the t~ee percent limitation on the ~ss~ valU~ they ~uld :the Measure 5 cap. He added if the real m~k~ ~I~e¢fl~en~ or ~6ntinues to, 50 value sta~s bumping up against that ~ ~0ted that ~ ~ ~O~ty s prope~i~s ~till had gaps. asked if there was ~ ~ ~or the County in te~s of the deficit the County is tr~ng to accomplish with the splice distd~ have ~ed to :~ ~Y those splices that ~e most valuable to the citizens of the and outside~, ~i~:Understanding was the cities and the County would work to what ~0~:~:~e~ices are that would be best dealt with the Public Safety District ~!hoSe ~Ounts Iff:be built into the levy. Russ Burger, She~f~ ~ained the question is whether or not the Metro el~ could be mended to allow for the se~i~ ~dct. He said they have ideas about the need but they need a Page 5 - Joint Elected Officials Meeting - April 19, 2005 WD bc/~05035/T