Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Replying to other questions of Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Pierce said the ordinance gives <br />the Nuclear Free Zone Board power to do certain things and to develop a plan <br />for funding activities. She said the $5,000 fee to anyone who succeeds in <br />obtaining an injunction against a violation of the ordinance would be paid by <br />the defendant. Mr. Potter said the estimated cost of $15,000 to $45,000 <br />annually for the Nuclear Free Zone Board includes overhead expenses and the <br />salary for a person who would work one-third time to full-time. <br /> <br />Responding to questions from Mr. Miller, Ms. Pierce said no specific court <br />opinions indicate that a ban on nuclear weapons activity is unconstitutional. <br />However, similar bans on transportation of nuclear wastes, nuclear power <br />production, and the storage of nuclear wastes have been declared <br />unconstitutional although the bans have not been in nuclear-free ordinances. <br />Answering questions from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Potter said enforcement and legal <br />costs will depend on how active the City is in enforcing the ordinance. <br />Mr. Gleason said minimum enforcement would mean the City's professional staff <br />would have to investigate complaints which may have to be reviewed by <br />attorneys who will file a finding. The City might have to defend a complaint. <br />In the case of a violation, the City would be involved in the litigation. He <br />said the C~ty has spent about $5,000 of staff time and $8,000 for legal work on <br />the ordinance so far. <br /> <br />Answering questions from Ms. Ehrman, Mr. Sercombe said the City Attorney has <br />had a responsibility to defend the City since the ordinance was passed if a <br />legal challenge to the ordinance is filed. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said passage of the Nuclear-Free Zone ordinance has created <br />somewhat of a maze for the council. He said it is clear that Eugene is a <br />nuclear-free zone. It is also clear that the City has legal problems created <br />by the ordinance as well as financial burdens. He said the council must find a <br />solution to the problems. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie distributed the outline of a process for implementing the nuclear- <br />free zone ordinance. The outline was titled, "Mayor1s Proposal on Nuclear <br />Free Zone." He said it acknowledged that Eugene is a nuclear-free zone and <br />suggested applicants for a temporary Nuclear Free Zone Task Force be recruited <br />from the City Council, research community, nuclear-free zone proponents, <br />League of Women Voters, Chamber of Commerce, Cl ergy & Laity Concerned, <br />education community, Planning Commission, and the Board of County <br />Commissioners. The outline also suggested that the Task Force concentrate on <br />advising the City on notification processes, advising the City on placement of <br />nuclear-free zone signs, and studying legal issues, practical issues, and the <br />relationship of the nuclear-free zone to the City's economic development <br />programs. The outline suggested the task force should complete its work by <br />April 1, but Mayor Obie said he would like to delete the date and ask the task <br />force to complete the work as soon as possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer said he is concerned about the impact that the discrepancy between <br />the regulations in Eugene and Springfield will have on economic development. <br />He suggested that representatives from the Eugene/Springfield Metropolitan <br />Partnership be appointed to the task force instead of representatives of the <br />education community. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 14, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />