Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />funding proposal, Eugene would receive an increase of about $750,000 in road- <br />related revenues for FY88, which would grow to an increase of almost $3 <br />million in FY92. He said the City currently received about $2 million per <br />year. Mr. Smith showed needs according to jurisdictions and compared them <br />with the proposed distribution of new revenues. He said State needs would be <br />addressed first, and City and County needs would be addressed more after the <br />first six years. He said needs were greatest on arterials and collectors, so <br />most new funds would be allocated to those roads. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith said the proposal that had emerged from the study would increase <br />revenues by $1.12 billion over the next six years. The proposal included a <br />light-duty vehicle title fee, an increase in registration fees from $20 <br />biannually to $40 for light-duty vehicles, and a gradual increase in the gas <br />tax/weight mile tax by 2~ a year over five years. He said the proposal would <br />allow about one-half of the needs over the first six years to be met. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith showed charts indicating that registration fees currently accounted <br />for a small portion of revenues. He said the title fee would be an entrance <br />charge like that in place in several other states, and he noted that most <br />charges were higher than the 2 percent rate being proposed. He also noted <br />that the title fee would be the only inflation-sensitive revenue in the <br />system. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Smith said the Public Works Department could continue to work on <br />product i vity improvements, and he noted that the department already had <br />achieved improvements of 2 to 3 percent annually over the past 10 years. He <br />said property taxes currently carried about 17 percent of the road-financing <br />burden, and he said additional revenues from that source appeared unlikely, <br />although he added that serial levies were being used by some jurisdictions. <br />He said other sources of revenue mi ght i ncl ude development charges, 1 oca 1 <br />option gas taxes, ,street and drainage fees. He said policy changes might be <br />needed in the area of assessments, and the steering committee had concluded <br />that innovative revenue sources probably would be a minor contributor. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith noted that Eugene's operating and maintenance costs were <br />considerably below average in comparison to other large Oregon cities, which <br />he attributed to recent productivity gains. Ms. Schue asked whether Eugene <br />roads were being maintained to the same standards as other cities. Mr. Smith <br />said he felt that the basic service level was similar but was being provided <br />more efficiently. He said some productivity gains still could be made. He <br />said Eugene' s rate of spending for overlays ($2,200 per mile annually) <br />probably needed to double to avoid a serious decline in the state of the <br />system. Mr. Gleason commended Bob Hammitt for his work in achieving <br />productivity gains. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith said road problems in Oregon could be solved by three main steps: <br />1) to continue to focus on productivity gains; 2) to tolerate lower road <br />standards; and 3) to address funding issues to avoid future crises. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom asked how much road life could be extended by making repairs before <br />deterioration accelerated. Mr. Smith said if the road was caught while still <br />in fair condition, a structural overlay could extend the life 20 years. He <br />added, however, that funding constraints like those at present could result in <br />thinner overlays, which might extend road life by 8 to 12 years before further <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 21, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />