Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />the resale requirements, changes to the requirement for a reserve account, <br />retention of the Architect's and Engineer's Report, deletion of the <br />requirement for a warranty account, and replacement of the reference to the <br />Housing Code with a reference to the Uniform Building Code. Discussing the <br />tenant protections, she said the commission recommended retention of <br />notification requirements for all tenants at the beginning of the conversion <br />process, removal of the eviction and rent control requirements for general <br />category tenants, changes to the eligibility requirements for special <br />category tenants, and changes to the benefits which special category tenants <br />receive. She said the commission recommended deletion of the requirement that <br />comparable housing be offered to special category tenants and the requirement <br />that a lifetime lease be offered to special category tenants if comparable <br />housing cannot be offered. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson said the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission <br />recommendations on January 28, 1987. The councilors asked for information <br />about options for modifying the Planning Commission's recommendations <br />concerning relocation, comparable housing, and lifetime leases; the State law <br />which pre-empts the City's ability to control rents during the condominium <br />conversion process; and a comparison of the median income of elderly people to <br />the median income of everyone in the community. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson said options for modifying the Planning Commission's <br />recommendations include: 1) maintaining the comparable housing and lifetime <br />lease provisions and applying them to a limited group of people such as those <br />who would be classified as disabled or elderly using the guidelines <br />recommended by the Planning Commission and who have incomes of 80 percent or <br />less of the median income, 2) applying the comparable housing and lifetime <br />lease provisions to people who are identified as special category tenants in <br />the existing ordinance and who live in apartments when the revisions to the <br />ordinance are adopted, or 3) deleting the comparable housing and lifetime <br />lease provisions and extending the Notice.to Vacate from 180 days to one or <br />two yea rs. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson said an oplnlon of the City Attorney dated February 9, 1987, <br />titled "Applicability of ORS 91.225(2) to Condominium Conversion Ordinance" <br />indicates that the Planning Commission recommendation concerning rent control <br />may be legal. She said the recommendation prohibits unreasonable rent <br />increases for special category tenants during the conversion process. <br /> <br />Ms. Johnson distributed two pages titled "Age of Householder by Family Income <br />in 1979 for Oregon, all Counties, and Places over 2500" to the councilors. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman opened the public hearing. She announced that the council will <br />probably not act on the revisions to the Condominium Conversion Ordinance this <br />evening. <br /> <br />Mary Stogsdill, 2556 Dover Drive, read her testimony and then submitted it in <br />writing. She said she managed Forest Village Apartments from November 1982 <br />through February 1984 when the development was owned by CTL Management Company <br />in Portland. She said CTL Company officials filed an application with the <br />City to convert the apartments to condominiums. The process required the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 9, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />