Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />become efficient in the last few years. He encouraged Chamber of Commerce <br />representatives to communicate recent changes in City processes and <br />organization to business people. <br /> <br />Mr. Douglas said some City processes have been greatly improved but some <br />proce.sses such as the historic review process need to be improved. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller said the Business Contact Program is a four-month program. He <br />wondered if it could be an eight- or nine-month program. Mr. Douglas <br />responded that the program relies on volunteers and they do not want to <br />undertake more than four months' work at a time. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she supports the Business Contact Program. She said the <br />report indicates that business owners and operators in the community think the <br />City gives more help and incentives to new businesses than to existing <br />businesses. Mr. Douglas responded that the City's programs need to be more <br />clearly articulated. He said he would like to discuss the matter with CCED. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan said the report is a good one. He said he often defends the City's <br />processes. He said his comments are needed because people do not understand <br />what the City is doing. He encouraged City and Chamber of Commerce <br />representatives to communicate better with the business community. He also <br />encouraged business people to testify before City bodies so their comments can <br />be considered. He especially encouraged business people to testify during the <br />budget process. <br /> <br />IV. SEMI-ANNUAL ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT--JUNE-DECEMBER <br />1986 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the item. Jim Croteau of the Planning <br />Department gave the staff report. He said the report provides the council <br />with an opportunity to monitor land use and other development-related <br />decisions made by the Hearings Official and Planning Commission. He said nine <br />zone change requests were considered by the Hearings Official from June to <br />December 1986. Two decisions of the Hearings Official were appealed to the <br />Planning Commission and the commission upheld the Hearings Official's <br />decisions in both cases. He reviewed the requests and the decisions. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau said nine requests for conditional use permits and planned unit <br />developments (PUD) were considered by the Hearings Official from July to <br />December 1987. Approval of one of the permits was appealed to the Planning <br />Commission which upheld the decision of the Hearings official. He said the <br />expansion of Laurelwood Golf Course was submitted as a tentative PUD and the <br />Hearings Official.s decision was upheld upon appeal to the Planning <br />Commission. He said the council will be involved before a request for a <br />proposa 1 for the expansion is issued. The approval of the PUD has been <br />appealed to the State Land Use Board of Appeals. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau reviewed the requests for sign and zoning variances considered in <br />the last half of 1986. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />April 15, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />