Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />squadll that had formed up to intervene, although intervention had not been <br />necessary. He compared that approach to the "low-key and non-intimidating" <br />prevent i ve exp 1 anat ions offered by Lane County pol ice offi cers and by <br />Springfield police on the mornings of May 5 and 6 at North Eugene High School, <br />Shilo Inn, and the Red Lion Inn. Mr. Beard said no problems had occurred at <br />those encounters. He also described the arrest at Parker Elementary School of <br />Susan Chubb as "an inefficient overreaction" by Eugene police. <br /> <br />Mr. Beard said an instance not mentioned in his letter had occurred at Madison <br />Middle School, where State police again had used two officers to intervene <br />early and where no problems had occurred. He said some instances over the <br />past two weeks may have requi red "1 arge massed forces, \I but he thought that on <br />many occasions, Eugene police had overreacted and had dispatched many more <br />cars and officers than was necessary. He suggested that Eugene police <br />consider the role model provided by the three other jurisdictions and their <br />methods. He asked why extensive amounts of force appeared to be the rule <br />rather than the exception, and he said he thought the city needed a police <br />policy of initial, low-key, non-intimidating intervention, not a "riot squad <br />menta 1 ity. \I <br /> <br />Mr. Beard noted that an addendum to his letter offered to provide a video of <br />the "overreaction" in which more than 20 officers had been used to arrest five <br />teachers at Cal Young Middle School on May 7. He added that he appreciated the <br />council IS time. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said numerous councilors had inquired as to responses of the Police <br />Division during the strike, and some of them had met with the City Manager and <br />with representatives of the Police Division. She added that additional <br />information regarding the incident at Cal Young School also had been <br />requested, so concerns were not going unnoticed or unheard. <br /> <br />II. PUBLIC HEARING: RIVERFRONT PARK SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT <br />(CA 87-3) <br /> <br />Assistant City Manager Dave Whitlow introduced the item. Pat Decker of the <br />Planning Department presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker said the establishment of a Riverfront Park Special Development <br />Di stri ct was the second step in a several-step process i nvo 1 vi ng the <br />Riverfront Research Park and would implement the Riverfront Park Study adopted <br />two years ago. She said the issues at tonightls hearing included whether the <br />district was consistent with special district code provisions, the Riverfront <br />Park Study, the Metropolitan Plan, and other policy documents. Ms. Decker <br />noted that staff notes described issues that had been raised during <br />consideration of the district by the Riverfront Design Advisory Committee, the <br />Riverfront Research Park Commission, and the Planning Commission. She added <br />that the Planning Commission had received and considered public testimony in <br />making its recommendations. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker said the district would set parameters for future development of <br />the Riverfront Research Park, and she reviewed some of the sections in the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 11, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />