Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />balancing interests. Mr. Corson said the Planning Commission had adopted or <br />addressed all of the suggestions and concerns submitted by the Riverfront <br />Research Park Commission, in addition to adding some important new provisions <br />of its own, which he reviewed. He noted that the district called for <br />protection and enhancement of the natural vegetation between the river's edge <br />and the top of the bank and for landscaped areas, open areas, and vegetation <br />between any deve 1 opment and the ri ver. He also noted that the proposed <br />district called for extensive public access to the river, as well as for fair <br />amounts of solar access to recreation areas. Finally, Mr. Corson noted that <br />in order to preserve some of the natural attractiveness of the site, the <br />district would limit building heights, would require setbacks from buildings, <br />and generally would require underground utilities and that signs not be <br />directed to users of the river. He said these types of provisions and <br />requirements reflected a concern for the unique qualities of the site and a <br />responsiveness to public input. He said the proposed zoning encouraged <br />continued public access, use, recreation, and enjoyment of the riverfront <br />area, while at the same time allowing limited and controlled development. Mr. <br />Corson said the Ri verfront Research Park Commi ssi on strongly supported <br />adoption of the zoning designation. <br /> <br />John Moseley, 1925 Dogwood Drive, University of Oregon Vice President for <br />Research, urged the council to adopt the recommended zoning. He said the <br />district had been reviewed extensively within the University and by the <br />Ri verfront Research Park Commi ssi on and he thought the zoni ng addressed <br />general issues in a positive, balanced way. Mr. Moseley said the Master <br />Development Plan would show details of how the zoning would be carried out, <br />along with recommendations from the Universityls Campus Planning Committee <br />and other groups participating in the forum with the developer and planner. <br />He said he thought the forums had been useful in informing the zoning plan, <br />which along with the Master Development Plan, would "substantially enhance the <br />riverfront area and the Willamette Greenway, while at the same time allowing <br />development of research and related activities that will enhance the <br />Universityls research and be a significant catalyst for economic development <br />in the a rea. II <br /> <br />John Replinger, 41 West 35th Avenue, said he had attended the previous public <br />forums and was pleased to see how they had transpired. He said he thought the <br />project could be done well, and he offered three suggestions for changes to <br />the ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Rep 1 i nger urged the council to increase the requi red setback from the <br />proposed 35 feet to 60 feet from the river bank. He said he thought evidence <br />had showed that architects easily could accomodate a setback of 60 to 100 <br />feet, adding that he wished the EWEB facility had been completed so that the <br />implications of building so close to the river could be seen. <br /> <br />Mr. Replinger said he thought the solar access requirements as proposed were <br />very lenient and he would prefer that a December 21 date be used as the basis <br />for performance. He said that change would make the ordinance slightly more <br />restrictive, but it would apply only to 60 percent of the frontage. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 11, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />