Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Porter reviewed the work plan in council packets, noting the timing of <br /> City Council actions and other elements. He said the State Fire Marshal's <br /> e inventory had been expected in March of this year, but because only portions <br /> of that inventory had been completed, the work plan had been set back. He said <br /> a supplementary City survey also was needed before adopting Article 80 of the <br /> Uniform Fire Code in order to allow time to work with existing businesses to <br /> make sure they understand the new ordi nance. Mr. Porter said community <br /> involvement efforts were expected to include the Citizen Involvement <br /> Committee, the Chamber of Commerce, the Metropolitan Partnership, and other <br /> industry groups' review and input. The University of Oregon would also be <br /> brought into this process. He said staff proposed that the regulatory process <br /> for zoning/land use, transportation, and treatment make use of existing update <br /> processes rather than initiating new processes. <br /> Mr. Porter said Councilor Holmer had mentioned omissions of sol id waste <br /> management and biological waste, and he said those areas would be included <br /> under treatment. He also said experts would be hired to deal with those <br /> areas. <br /> Mr. Porter said Fire Marshal Roger Cleland also was available to answer <br /> questions. Mr. Cleland said the Western Fire Chiefs and Building Code <br /> Officials were moving very quickly with adoption of Article 80 of the Uniform <br /> Fire Code in order to allow adoption of a national code with the '88 code- <br /> approval process. He said the State probably would not adopt the code until <br /> 1988, but he added that the 12 exempt cities in the state were approving <br /> Article 80 later this year. <br /> Ms. Ehrman asked about the mention in a June 10, 1987, memo that the City's <br /> e response team could be designated a regional response team for the State and <br /> whether that would include funding from the State. Mr. Cleland said that <br /> action was part of Senate Bills 115, 116, and 123 now before the Legislature. <br /> He said funding was a part of a $4.5 million package proposed for the <br /> Department of Environmental Quality. He said staff hoped for State support, <br /> but the process still was unresolved. <br /> Mr. Holmer said previous discussions had suggested that the program be self- <br /> ! sustaining, but the memo suggested that one-third of the cost be charged to <br /> the Genera 1 Fund because fees would not be sufficient. He asked about the <br /> rationale for that. Mr. Porter said staff was hesitant to state what fees <br /> would be, but they now appeared to be in the range of $200 per firm. He said <br /> that to exceed that fee would make Eugene inconsistent with other communities <br /> that did subsidize the fees. He said staff hoped to discuss the issue with <br /> industry representatives, and he noted that the regulations were advantageous <br /> for their own protection and insurance costs. He said the two-thirds was an <br /> estimate, but he said staff thought a subsidy would be required, at least in <br /> the beginning, in order to keep fees in line with the rest of the State. He <br /> said more detail on that issue would be presented at a future meeting. Mr. <br /> Whitlow added that the level of user fees or public subsidy or both would be a <br /> council decision. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 17, 1987 Page 12 <br /> i <br /> j <br /> 1 <br /> ~ <br /> < <br /> ~ <br />