My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/24/1987 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1987
>
06/24/1987 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 2:13:00 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/24/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Referri ng to the second fl ipchart~ Mr. Byrne out 1 i ned another fi nanci a 1 <br /> scenario~ in which the agency would decide to make a major capital <br /> - improvements expenditure: <br /> Funds Spent on Capital Projects: $ 1. 1 mill ion <br /> Ending Working Capital: $ 2.0 million <br /> Mr. Byrne said that the agency would hope that this expenditure would generate <br /> additional tax increment in future years. He said that when making decisions <br /> about spending on capital projects, the agency must determine what type of <br /> capital investment will stimulate the most tax increment flow. Another issue <br /> is whether a given capital expenditure will leave the agency with enough <br /> ending working capital. <br /> In response to a question from Ms. Ehrman, Mr. Byrne said this financial <br /> scenario was analogous to what occurred when the agency made the improvements <br /> on West Broadway: money was allocated to the West Broadway capital project; <br /> and the agency's ending working capital was reduced. <br /> Using the third flipchart~ Mr. Byrne outlined another financial scenario, in <br /> which the agency would decide to incur a new debt in order to stimulate <br /> private development (e.g. ~ the agency might incur the debt to build a parking <br /> garage). He said the updated plan recommends that new debts be incurred only <br /> in response to specific development that will generate new tax increment. He <br /> said the goal is to have the revenue from new tax increment flow offset the <br /> cost of additional debt service. He added that this new increment tends to <br /> 1 ag a year or two behi nd the debt servi ce that is incurred. The thi rd <br /> e flipchart outlined this scenario: <br /> Agency Resources: <br /> --Beginning Working Capital $ 3.0 mi 11 ion <br /> --Tax Increment Flow 2.0 million <br /> --New Tax Increment .5 million <br /> (one- or two- year lag) $ 5.5 million <br /> Agency's Fixed Expenditures: <br /> --Existing Debt Service $ 1.4 million <br /> --Agency Operations .5 million <br /> --New Debt Service .5 mi 11 ion <br /> $ 2.4 million <br /> Funds Available for Projects: $ 3.1 mill ion <br /> (resources minus fixed expenses) <br /> Funds Spent on Capital Projects: $ .1 mi 11 ion <br /> Ending Working Capital: $ 3.0 million <br /> Mr. Byrne said the updated Urban Renewal Plan's Finance Plan combines the last <br /> two financial scenarios. Sometimes large debts will be incurred (primarily to <br /> build parking structures) in support of development; following this~ tax <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 24, 1987 Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.