Laserfiche WebLink
May 4. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Pap6, Mr. Yeiter clarified the details of how such historic districts <br />currently operated. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser said all cities around the state would be affected, and Eugene's case would be the focal of the <br />argument. He thought Eugene should oppose the bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said the bill made it impossible to truly create a historic district because if people opt out the <br />districts lose their integrity. Ms. Taylor noted the considerable amount of work residents of the neighbor- <br />hood had gone through to form the district. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser recommended the committee take a position of Priority 3, Oppose, on the legislation in question. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to take a position of Priority 3, Oppose, to <br /> HB 3312. The motion passed, 2:1; Mr. Pap6 voting no. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman left the meeting. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor, seconded by Mr. Pap6, moved to forward the committee's recommendations to <br /> the council for adoption. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Heuser said the opponents of the Lane County Local Government Boundary Commission were meeting <br />with the committee chair that morning to put forward their case. He said that all eight Lane County <br />legislators had signed a letter in support of the boundary commission, which he provided to the committee <br />chair. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:14 a.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on INtergovernmental Relations April 28, 2005 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />