My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: IGR Committee Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 05/23/05 Mtg
>
Item 2C: IGR Committee Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:33:32 PM
Creation date
5/18/2005 4:15:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/23/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
some retroactive elements but they would not affect Eugene. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor about the Forest Legacy Program, Mr. Heuser said the bill was <br />still stalled in the House Environment Committee. The chair of the committee had not shut the door on the <br />possibility of a public hearing. Senator Frank Shields of Portland was intensely interested in the bill and <br />was working to get it passed. <br /> <br />Referring to HB 2943, a bill that would raise the cap for companies paying a toxics right-to-know fee, Mr. <br />Heuser said the chair of the committee had suggested willingness to consider raising the cap if the City <br />capped the cost of operating the City's Toxics Right-to-Know Program at $100,000. Mr. Heuser had <br />attempted to explain to him that the City also had an interest in keeping the program costs low. Ms. <br />Bettman questioned whether such a cap was a bad idea if it allowed for growth in the program as the <br />community grew. She acknowledged, in response to a comment from Mr. Pap~, that such a cap did touch <br />on the issue of home rule. Ms. Bettman suggested that a cap on the program costs was less onerous than a <br />cap on the fee, and more accurately helped to fulfill the charter objective. <br /> <br />The CCIGR agreed to consider the bill again the following week after Mr. Heuser discussed the issue with <br />the relevant parties. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to forward the recommendations of the <br /> committee to the full council. The motion passed unanimously. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 10:15 a.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations May 5, 2005 Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.