Laserfiche WebLink
Page 7 of 10 <br /> <br /> REPORT ID: CELEG3 LEGISLATIVE TRACKING PAGE: 4 <br /> RL <br /> BILLS AND RESPONSE DETAIL DATRU~ <br /> TIME: 3:: <br /> PM <br /> <br /> BILLS SENT DUE DATE SUBJECT PRIORITY RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br /> COMMENTS: THIS BILL CLARIFIES WHAT IS MEANT BY "COMMUNITY <br /> ORGANIZATION" AND "NEIGHBORHOOD ORGANIZATION" WITH <br /> REGARD TO REVIEW AND NOTIFICATION FOR LAND USE <br /> DECISIONS. GENERALLY THIS IS A GOOD IDEA IN THAT IT IS <br /> FAIRLY SPECIFIC IN DEFINING WHAT CONSTITUTES AND WHAT <br /> REQUIRMENTS MUST BE MET FOR A GROUP TO BE CONSIDERED A <br /> COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP - AND TO HAVE STANDING <br /> IN A LAND USE DECISION. MY ONLY CONCERN IS THAT THE <br /> LOCAL GOVERNEMENT WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH <br /> BODIES IS TO KEEP RECORDS TO AFFIRM THAT THE DEFINITION <br /> OF COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS HAVE BEEN MET. <br /> THIS COULD PUT THE CITY IN AN UNUSAL REGULATOR ROLE. I <br /> WOULD LIKE TO HAVE SUSAN MUIR ALSO WEIGH IN ON THIS <br /> BILL. <br /> <br /> I DO THINK IT SHOULD BE SUPPORTED, BUT WE MAY WNAT TO <br /> CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT LOCAL <br /> GOVERNMENT TAKE ON THE ROLE OF RECORD KEEPER FOR THESE <br /> GROUPS. <br /> MARY WALSTON <br /> MARCH 22, 2005 <br /> <br /> SUSAN PDD- <br /> 4/13/2005 PRI 3 YES V.C.2 SUPPORT <br /> MUIR PLAN <br /> <br /> COMMENTS: I AM UNSURE OF THE EFFECT ON OUR EXISTING DEFINITION OF <br /> NEIGHBORHOOD - WILL DEFER TO BETH B. WILL LIKELY HAVE <br /> LITTLE IMPACT ON LAND USE NOTICING, ALTHOUGH MAY <br /> ENCOURAGE MORE SPLINTER NEIGHBORHOOD GROUPS WHICH CAN <br /> GET DIFFICULT AS THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RELY <br /> ON THESE GROUPS TO REPRESENT THE IMPACTED <br /> NEIGHBORHOODS. <br /> <br />HB 3143 3/17/2005 3/31/2005 ENTERPRISE ZONES PRI 2 NEUT/AM <br />RELATING RELATING TO ENTERPRISE ZONES; CREATING NEW PROVISIONS; AMENDING ORS <br />CLAUSE 285C.050, 285C.080, 285C.085, 285C.090, 285C.115, 285C.120, 285C.130, <br /> 285C.160, 285C.165, 285C.220, 285C.245, 285C.250, 285C.320 AND 285C.353 <br /> AND SECTION 56, CHAPTER 662, OREGON <br /> <br />TITLE ELIMINATES ECONOMIC HARDSHIP REQUIREMENTS THAT AREAS MUST MEET <br /> TO BE DESIGNATED ENTERPRISE ZONES. ELIMINATES LIMITATION ON <br /> NUMBER OF ZONES THAT MAY BE DESIGNATED. ELIMINATES 10-YEAR <br /> MAXIMUM DURATION OF ZONE DESIGNATION. ALLOWS ZONE SPONSOR TO <br /> ESTABLISH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL TWO-YEAR PERIOD OF <br /> EXEMPTION AND PERMITS GREATER PERIOD OF TIME DURING WHICH <br /> AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL PERIOD OF EXEMPTION MAY BE <br /> EXECUTED. <br /> TAKES EFFECT ON 91ST DAY FOLLOWING ADJOURNMENT SINE DIE. <br /> <br /> POL <br /> CONTACT RESPONDENT DEPARTMENT UPDATED PRIORITY POLICY NL~4RECO~NDATION <br /> <br /> DENNY DENNY PDD- 4/15/2005 PRI 2 YES III.B.1.A SUPPORT/AM <br /> <br />http ://ceonline/celeg/reports/BillsDetail. asp 5/12/2005 <br /> <br /> <br />