Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> charter amendment requiring voter approval of urban renewal plans and <br /> projects." Mr. Holmer added that he was absolutely opposed to the measure, <br /> e because he thought it would fail to do the job the way it ought to be done, but <br /> he did not agree that the council should approve the ballot title. <br /> Ms. Bascom said the issue that appeared to concern the drafters of the <br /> initiative was letting the voters of the community have their say in voting on <br /> urban renewal measures, and that issue would be discussed, but she today found <br /> no significant disagreements about the wording of the title. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said she had given no weight to Mr. Harms's opinion in making her <br /> decision. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the council was voting only on the narrow issue defined <br /> by the City Attorney, and not on the merits of the initiative. <br /> Mr. Holmer moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to deny the appeal <br /> of Initiative Ballot Title #51. Roll call vote; the motion <br /> carried 7:1, Councilors Ehrman, Miller, Schue, Bascom, <br /> Wooten, Rutan, and Bennett voting aye; Councilor Holmer <br /> vot i ng nay. <br /> Councilors Ehrman and Rutan left the meeting at 1:25 p.m., and Council Vice <br /> President Freeman Holmer assumed the chair. He recessed the meeting of the <br /> Eugene City Council and convened a meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency. <br /> III. EUGENE RENEWAL AGENCY: EUGENE CONFERENCE CENTER/HILTON HOTEL <br /> e AGREEMENT AMENDMENT <br /> City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the item. Development Director Abe <br /> Farkas introduced the staff report. Mr. Farkas noted that the City Council <br /> and Renewal Agency in 1980 had approved an agreement for an arrangement <br /> between the Eugene Community Conference Center and the owners of the Hilton <br /> Hotel for use of the conference center facilities. He said staff would review <br /> the history of that arrangement and would present information about a new <br /> arrangement with prospective buyers. Mr. Farkas said the prospective <br /> purchasers worked with a group of venture capital associates from the Southern <br /> California area and who operated about eight or ten other hotels. He added <br /> that the City Council and the council as Renewal Agency would need to provide <br /> the City Manager with the authority to approve the amendments to the original <br /> agreement. <br /> Bob Hibschman of the Development Department presented the staff report. He <br /> noted that the Hilton Hotel had been constructed about ten years ago as part <br /> of a hotel project for a renewal agency parcel in the downtown area. That <br /> project had resulted in an agreement with the 6th Avenue Hotel Associates and <br /> in a subsequent agreement for development of the hotel and conference center. <br /> He said First Interstate Bank last year had assumed control of the hotel, and <br /> City staff had re-evaluated the agreement and operational relationships with <br /> the parking and conference center facilities. He said staff believed the <br /> proposed agreement was very benefi cia 1 for the City, for the continued <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 21, 1987 Page 10 <br />