Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> enlightened community, not to change the existing ordinance in the interest of <br /> an energy source that is environmentally safe and enhances local se If- <br /> e reliance. <br /> Richard E. Miller, 2460 Macabar Dr., is a member of the Eugene Chamber of <br /> Commerce Board of Directors and a member of the Planning Land Use <br /> Subcommittee. He said he is in favor of the amendments because they transfer <br /> the cost of the solar heating system to those who benefit from the solar <br /> ordinance. If a person wants the benefit of solar access, he or she should <br /> purchase it, he said. <br /> Sally Weston, 2595 Highland Dr., said she is appearing before the council on <br /> behalf of the League of Women Voters. She asked the council to heed the advice <br /> of EWES and retain the existing solar access ordinances. She noted the <br /> ordinance is already a compromise for those on both sides of the solar access <br /> issue. She said individuals should be able to make their own choice about <br /> access to the sun and not have it dictated to them by what gets built on <br /> neighboring lots. <br /> Mayor Obie closed the public hearing. He asked if staff has any response to <br /> the public hearing. <br /> Mr. Croteau responded to a suggestion from Mr. Bennett that the City conduct a <br /> review of the ordinance after six months. He said staff is suggesting that a <br /> review of the ordinance, if passed, take place one year from the recommended <br /> implementation date of December 1. A six-month review would fall at the <br /> beginning of the next construction season and there would not be enough time <br /> to measure its effects. He said staff will be following what occurs in the <br /> e Portland area and giving regular status reports to the council. <br /> Rega rdi ng the comments by Mr. Rich and the undeveloped lots in the south <br /> hills, Mr. Croteau said there are exemptions within the solar access ordinance <br /> that address steep slopes and heavily wooded lots. In no case would someone <br /> be prohibited from building a structure on a particular lot. <br /> Concerning the high cost of slope studies cited by Mr. Iverson, Mr. Croteau <br /> said the kind of information required by the building permit is contained on <br /> contour maps, which are available to the public. He said he is available to <br /> answer questions, although more technical inquiries should be addressed to Les <br /> Tumidaj, a private consultant with the Planning Department. <br /> Mayor Obie recessed the meeting at 9 p.m. for a short break. <br /> Mayor Obie reconvened the meeting at 9:10 p.m. He asked the council if they <br /> had any questions for staff. <br /> Ms. Ehrman asked Mr. Tumidaj what the difference is between a 3-, 5- or 6- <br /> percent slope adjustment. Mr. Tumidaj responded that during discussions about <br /> the amendments, home builder representatives sa i d 3-percent slopes are <br /> difficult to measure. He said it was decided that slope calculations of 5 <br /> percent are an easier increment to work with. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 16, 1987 Page 6 <br />